Talk:Transformer utilization factor

	This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC
	This article was accepted on 21 January 2015 by reviewer Winner 42 (talk · contribs).

Electronics

	Electronics portal This article is part of WikiProject Electronics, an attempt to provide a standard approach to writing articles about electronics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. Leave messages at the project talk pageElectronicsWikipedia:WikiProject ElectronicsTemplate:WikiProject Electronicselectronic
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

junk

Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

So I'll say it again, junk. Despite the ref'ed material, consider I have an autotransformer rated 300VA at the output (it says so right on the label). I am generally using DC current in the milliamp range from an SS rectifier, hence dissipating a few milliwatts across the load. My TUF is therefore, for example .03w/300VA = .0001, negligible, nearly zero, which in circuit terms, would be abyssmal. Yes? Exactly according to the definition. That's why the definition, so widely quoted, is just as widely wrong.

In any case, this definition (good or bad) can be cut and pasted directly into the rectifier article, and this brain-dead page deleted.

Sbalfour (talk) 21:22, 14 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

This page was redesigned at the edge.

A page that knows where it met you.

Talk:Transformer utilization factor

junk