Talk:Transcription
Add topic| This disambiguation page does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||
| ||||||||
See also Talk:Transliteration. -- dnjansen
There is very little reason to move this page since What links to Transcription is overwhelming about the biological term. --mav
Clarity and simplicity
[edit]For beginners the page has neither - perhaps a basic overview of what transcription is and how it works would be beneficial. - ben
I am refering to the genetic transcription page.
— Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.248.82.158 (talk) 15:02, 28 February 2013 (UTC)
Linguistiques Imane zaynab (talk) 17:05, 22 February 2016 (UTC)
Small definition and "written copy"
[edit]I believe it is appropriate to use the term 'written,' despite non-phonetic uses such as genetic and technological. This is because both of those mediums metaphorically refer to writing (the DNA code involves lettering; data is written to disk). Again, I urge that the use of "Item W may refer to XYZ" be discontinued where possible, as it is essentially meaningless and there are usually much better replacements involving brief definitions – which are not prohibited (refer WP:DABSTYLE, "Start each list with a short introductory sentence fragment" and the linked MOS page, MOS:DAB.
Specifically, due to historical precedent I believe "Transcription (linguistics)" to be in some ways the most prominent (or in a way, "sub-primary" topic) as it has been around the longest; therefore MOS:DABPRIMARY applies over MOS:DABINT for generic introductory lines. Techhead7890 (talk) 11:57, 11 April 2018 (UTC) (PS: I think that's enough ruleslawyering for now!)
ترجمه
[edit]فوتشوب 37.239.167.23 (talk) 04:37, 5 June 2022 (UTC)
Suggestion: Add neutral reference on specialized transcription services
[edit]Hi everyone,
I noticed that the Transcription article explains the general process well, but the “Speech transcription” section doesn’t currently mention how transcription practices vary across professional industries such as law, healthcare, and education.
I’d like to suggest adding one neutral sentence in the Speech transcription → Service and software section, for context:
“Specialized transcription services are commonly used in professional settings such as legal, medical, and educational fields, where accuracy, confidentiality, and compliance are essential.”
As background, I recently published an informational overview, titled as — Tailored Transcription Services for Legal, Medical, and Education Sectors — that discusses these applications without promotional content, available at:
Disclosure: I’m affiliated with the site but I’m only offering it as a neutral supporting source for editors to review.
— Ankur Thakur, AI Video Summary (affiliated) Ankurclub (talk) 13:29, 22 October 2025 (UTC)