Talk:Transarc

This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Companies Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany

Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Companies To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies
Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles
Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention
Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes
Maintain : Portal:Companies
Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs
Other :
- Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template
- Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner
- Answer requests for comments

Pittsburgh Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pittsburgh, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Pittsburgh and its metropolitan area on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PittsburghWikipedia:WikiProject PittsburghTemplate:WikiProject PittsburghPittsburgh
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Software: Computing Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Software, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of software on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SoftwareWikipedia:WikiProject SoftwareTemplate:WikiProject Softwaresoftware
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Computing.

Untitled

> An editor has expressed a concern that the subject of the article does not satisfy the notability guideline

Untitled

Latest comment: 19 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Which suggests an editor is ignorant of computing history.

If the Andrew Project is worthy of an entry in Wikipedia, then Transarc, the commercial home of the Andrew Project (or, more specifically the Andrew File System) is worthy of discussion as well.

An argument could be made that the Transarc entry be merged with the Andrew Project article, or perhaps the OpenAFS article, but suggesting it just be deleted is shortsighted.

Bforte 22:36, 3 December 2006 (UTC)Reply

I strongly agree with Bforte and am removing the notability mark. AFS (and OpenAFS) are unquestionably notable, and Transarc was its steward for most of its life. Megacz 11:22, 23 March 2007 (UTC)Reply

This page was redesigned at the edge.

A page that knows where it met you.

Talk:Transarc

Untitled

Untitled