Talk:Train of Tomorrow

This article is written in American English, which has its own spelling conventions (center, color, defense, realize, traveled) and some terms may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.

A fact from Train of Tomorrow appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 5 February 2017 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that the dome cars of the Train of Tomorrow (pictured) were inspired by a ride in the Rocky Mountains in either an F-unit or a caboose's cupola?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Did you know archive/2017/February. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Train of Tomorrow.

Wikipedia

Trains: Passenger trains Mid‑importance

	Trains Portal
DYK	January 7, 2020

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated projects or task forces:
/
	This article is supported by the Passenger trains task force.

United States Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Shorter footnotes

Latest comment: 9 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

For the sheer number of books involved in this article Harvard-style shortened footnotes might better going forward. Also makes it simpler to verify citations. Mackensen (talk) 14:09, 5 January 2017 (UTC)Reply

Over-reliance?

Latest comment: 9 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

This article, while informative and readable, may over-rely on one source: Morgan. Surely there are other sources for some of these propositions. --Piledhigheranddeeper (talk) 02:59, 5 February 2017 (UTC)Reply

Go for it, Piledhigheranddeeper. I did a thorough search for books on the train, and Morgan was the only full book I could find. I found bits and pieces in other books, as you can see from the references, but nothing really substantial. Michael Barera (talk) 05:40, 5 February 2017 (UTC)Reply

Locomotive

Latest comment: 9 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

The article currently does not mention the fate of the locomotive. It appears that it the UP converted it to an E8, Amtrak to an E9A, and now it is at Danbury Railway Museum in NYC regalia. It never served under the NYC, but was painted in their colors when placed in the museum. We have several images on Commons. Pi.1415926535 (talk) 04:44, 27 February 2017 (UTC)Reply

This page was redesigned at the edge.

A page that knows where it met you.

Talk:Train of Tomorrow

Shorter footnotes

Over-reliance?

Locomotive