Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a2211dd749572780

Jump to content

Talk:Tracking ship

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 15 years ago by Vegaswikian in topic Rename to something more global?

Rename to something more global?

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: page moved. Vegaswikian (talk) 20:40, 2 January 2011 (UTC)Reply



Missile Range Instrumentation ShipTracking shipWP:COMMONNAME Colds7ream (talk) 18:22, 26 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

Should this article be given a more global and more WP:COMMONNAME such as "Tracking Ship" - MRIM is a term that's only used in specialist circles to refer to one country's interpretation of a more general concept. 82.3.242.144 (talk) 15:09, 13 October 2008 (UTC)Reply

I agree entirely - Satellite tracking ship would be my suggestion. The whole article needs to deal more with tracking ships of other navies, such as the Soviet and Chinese, and generally needs expansion. Colds7ream (talk) 18:22, 26 December 2010 (UTC)Reply
I'm not so sure about Satellite tracking ship. Although that is a big part of what they do, often their primary function is to receive telemetry from military missile/rocket tests that usually have nothing to do with satellite communication. ChiZeroOne (talk) 18:39, 26 December 2010 (UTC)Reply
Simply 'Tracking ship', then? Colds7ream (talk) 18:42, 26 December 2010 (UTC)Reply
That would probably be more appropriate/generic, though we'd need to make sure that it is a common name for these vessels. ChiZeroOne (talk) 18:49, 26 December 2010 (UTC)Reply
It's certainly the term used in the Springer-Praxis books. Colds7ream (talk) 18:54, 26 December 2010 (UTC)Reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.