Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a25185e01c8698f1

Jump to content

Talk:Track and trace

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 8 months ago by GA-RT-22 in topic Errors on page

Merger proposal

[edit]

Track & Trace is a commonly used name for various tracking and tracing implementations (in particular related to the S10 (UPU standard)). The two articles are largely redundant with eachother.

Not sure which article should be merged into the other. "Track & Trace" certainly beats "Tracking and tracing" in the Google test, 1,220,000 results to 125,000, and is probably the term most people are familiar with, but on the other hand, "tracking and tracing" is more general. — Kwi | Talk 00:24, 19 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

I agree that these articles should be merged and that "Track & Trace" should be the lead article. — CClauss | Talk 12:24, 20 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

On merger proposals from space saver maniacs: The proposal of the etymologist is not bad, but nevertheless nonsense. The track and trace service offered by postal services is one thing and the tracking and tracing in logistics and in navigation applies to technological processing, not coinciding with a service definition of the high tech postman. Keep it as it is, space is not wasted, but stupid mingling of terms prevented.Wireless friend (talk) 23:32, 19 October 2008 (UTC)Reply
Yes they should be merged into one article and should be called "Track and trace". They are close already. Rlsheehan (talk) 20:31, 31 August 2009 (UTC)Reply
The vote (and lack of other current interest) says that a merger is in order. I will accomplish. Rlsheehan (talk) 16:19, 7 September 2009 (UTC)Reply
 Done Rlsheehan (talk) 14:49, 8 September 2009 (UTC)Reply

Errors on page

[edit]

The label for the figure is wrong - it is not an RFID tag, it is an LC resonator. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 160.39.157.179 (talk) 10:32, 12 October 2012 (UTC)Reply

You are correct, and 13 years later maybe it's time to correct this. Since LC tags are mostly used for loss prevention I switched it to a photo of an actual rfid tag used for tracking. GA-RT-22 (talk) 06:27, 13 November 2025 (UTC)Reply

Difference between tracking and tracing

[edit]

Don't the two words mean the same? I thought tracking was just finding out where something is and tracing following its route. But it appears that they are both used in both senses. Note that I am Dutch, so I might miss something. Oh, elsewhere I found that tracing is finding out where something has been and tracking where it is going. DirkvdM (talk) 08:29, 1 October 2020 (UTC)Reply