Talk:Townsend Harris

Okichi Saito

This article dismisses this as "largely fictitious" and does not mention it in any detail? It is the subject of film, novel and tourist attractions. Why is not more information available?--ZayZayEM (talk) 05:40, 28 November 2007 (UTC)

Presently the article is completely schizophrenic when it comes to Okichi. In one section it says "6  A 17 year-old named Tôjin Okichi was forced to have sex with Harris.[11]: 56–57  Harris rejected her after three days because of a skin eruption on her back and demanded "cleaner" girls.[11]: 57  Japanese officials provided him with two other teenagers in Spring and Summer 1858."

In another section it says that the "love affair" was "fictional". In another article about movie based on the purported sexual encounter/romance it's said that Okichi was merely a housekeeper and didn't have anything to do with him besides that. The article needs to give additional context on whether it's disputed by history or whether one narrative has a firm grounding above the other, and contextualize this better so that it doesn't read that in one section it's completely true and the other section it's Bull. — Preceding unsigned comment added by ~2026-13939-86 (talk) 04:31, 4 March 2026 (UTC)

In Popular Culture: Madame Butterfly

At present, this section ends with a stand alone sentence reading: "Harris's visit to Japan is the basis for Puccini's opera 'Madame Butterfly'." This is indicated as needing citation. More to the point, this seems to be a specious assertion. Perhaps reading the article one may make that assumption (and even feel inclined to add a sentence to the article saying as much) but, in fact, Madame Butterfly takes much inspiration from the Pierre Loti novel "Madame Chysantheme." Whether Loti's novel is inspired by the life of Harris, is another question. However, to my knowledge, at the end of the 19th century, Japanese women being ruined by foreign visitors and then killing themselves was prevalent enough a pattern that it would be difficult to say definitively that Harris' singular case was the inspiration for the various stories on this theme.

For this reason, I suggest deleting this final sentence. Any opposition? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 192.218.246.92 (talk) 00:29, 8 August 2012 (UTC)

It has only been a short time, but there has been no feedback about the removal of the aforementioned line at the end of the article. I take it upon myself to remove it. The original line can be find above if it becomes necessary to discuss this further. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 192.218.246.92 (talk) 04:03, 15 August 2012 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on Townsend Harris. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Corrected formatting/usage for http://bangkok.usembassy.gov/relation/timeline.html
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070312182849/http://www.cgj.org/150th/html/nyepiE2a.htm to http://www.cgj.org/150th/html/nyepiE2a.htm
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100615203412/http://www.ccny.cuny.edu/library/exhibitions/harris/harris_eight.html to http://www.ccny.cuny.edu/library/exhibitions/harris/harris_eight.html
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20041216225653/http://web.jjay.cuny.edu/~jobrien/reference/ob76.html to http://web.jjay.cuny.edu/~jobrien/reference/ob76.html
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110928171043/http://www.ccny.cuny.edu/library/exhibitions/harris/index.html to http://www.ccny.cuny.edu/library/exhibitions/harris/index.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:28, 26 December 2017 (UTC)

Disputed paragraph re: "teenage sex servants" — sourcing concerns

The paragraph in the "Time in Japan" section making claims about Harris requesting "teenage sex servants," forcing sex with Okichi, rejecting her over a skin condition, and being supplied with two further teenagers, is sourced entirely to a single work: Mark W. Driscoll's The Whites Are Enemies of Heaven: Climate Caucasianism and Asian Ecological Protection (Duke University Press, 2020), pp. 56–57.

I have several concerns and am flagging them here before making any edits.

1. The source is not a work about Townsend Harris Driscoll's book is a work of postcolonial theory and ecocriticism examining 19th-century Western imperialism in Asia broadly. Harris appears incidentally as one example serving a larger ideological argument. Using it as the sole citation for highly specific factual claims about his personal conduct is a sourcing problem regardless of one's view of the book's overall merits.

2. The claims directly contradict sources that specifically cover Harris and Okichi The Kodansha Encyclopedia of Japan (Kodansha, 1983, vol. 6, p. 93, s.v. "Okichi") describes Okichi as one of Harris's housekeepers who was dismissed after three days of work, with no mention of sexual coercion. William Elliot Griffis's Townsend Harris, First American Envoy in Japan (Houghton Mifflin, 1895), based on Harris's own journals, contains nothing supporting these claims. The Wikipedia article on The Barbarian and the Geisha explicitly states that historians regard the sexual relationship narrative as fictional.

3. WP:UNDUE and WP:EXTRAORDINARY apply here These are serious and specific allegations about a named historical figure's personal conduct. Presenting them as established fact on the basis of one ideologically-oriented secondary source, against the weight of dedicated Harris scholarship, fails the bar set by both policies.

4. The origin of the Okichi narrative is well-documented Historians have traced the lurid version of the Harris-Okichi story to a 1928 Japanese novel, Karajin to Okichi, by Saburo Juichiyagi, written during a period of nationalist anti-American sentiment. Per the Kodansha Encyclopedia of Japan (vol. 6, p. 93), the fictional romance gained wide currency through popular novels, plays, and films of that era, and specialist historians have consistently treated it as folklore rather than documented history. Driscoll appears to be reviving this narrative within an academic framework, but that does not make it a reliable basis for Wikipedia's biographical content on Harris.

Proposed resolution: The paragraph should be removed. If editors feel Driscoll's interpretation deserves mention, the appropriate approach is to attribute it explicitly ("Historian Mark Driscoll argues that...") while also presenting the mainstream scholarly view. Presenting it as uncontested fact is not appropriate given the sourcing situation. Happy to discuss further before any changes are made. Y2Kangz (talk) 21:20, 1 April 2026 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia! This is an extremely thoughtful first post.

I therefore do not want to seem overly critical, but in arguing for an "academic consensus" against the recent Duke University Press text, describing it as a "single source," you have only cited two -- a 43 year old text and another from the 19th century. Likewise, you have said that 2020 Duke University Press is not specifically about Harris -- but the 43 year old text you reference is also specifically not about Harris, only the 19th century text is.

I don't follow why the proposition would be undue or exceptional. This is a historical period in which the coercion of servants for sex was not uncommon, even more so in the environment of which Harris was a part. Wikipedia is WP:NOTCENSORED.

Your contention that this may play into "Barbarian and the Geisha" tropes is of course an interesting bit of analysis, but that is the kind of WP:SYNTH which we cannot edit on the basis of.

You describe the Duke University Press as an "ideologically-oriented secondary source." Secondary sources are favored -- not disfavored -- on Wikipedia. Likewise, we recognize that sources often have a position, implicit and unacknowledged or explicit and embraced, but this does not make them problematic. If this is a concern to you, the 19th century text you cite may rather worse, as you emphasize that it draws on Harris' own writings (not surprisingly, I doubt we will find Harris narrating sexual coercion of a teenage servant in those terms). JArthur1984 (talk) 01:07, 2 April 2026 (UTC)

Thanks for the welcome.

The concern I want to keep on the table is narrower than I perhaps made it sound. The claims in the paragraph are highly specific: a particular reason for Okichi's dismissal, a particular demand made, two further individuals provided in specific seasons. I've done reasonable digging and cannot find these specific claims replicated or corroborated anywhere else in the literature on Harris or this period, which is itself notable for claims of this nature. Wikipedia is not censored, but it does require that detailed claims about identifiable individuals be supported by reliable, preferably independent sources (WP:V, WP:RS).

On the question of the source: nobody is disputing that Duke University Press is a reputable publisher. The issue is that this particular book is explicitly structured around a prosecutorial thesis regarding white Western conduct in Asia. That doesn't make it wrong, but it does mean that when it makes highly specific factual claims about an individual that don't appear anywhere else in the literature, those claims warrant a higher degree of scrutiny than they might from a work without that framing. Wikipedia recognizes that sources can have positions, but that's precisely why corroboration matters more, not less, in cases like this.

Given that you introduced this material, would you be able to speak to what Driscoll himself cites for these specific details on pp. 56-57? Whether or not you still have the text, any recollection of the sourcing behind these particular claims would help move the discussion forward. Y2Kangz (talk) 18:09, 2 April 2026 (UTC)

I’ll look to locate. JArthur1984 (talk) 04:32, 4 April 2026 (UTC)

Driscoll is citing Gary Leupp (2003), Interracial Intimacy in Japan: Western Men and Japanese Women, 1542-1900, and Oliver Statler (1969) Shimoda Story. JArthur1984 (talk) 01:45, 10 April 2026 (UTC)