Talk:Tower Transit

Buses Mid‑importance

	Buses portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Buses, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of buses on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BusesWikipedia:WikiProject BusesTemplate:WikiProject Busesbus transport
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

England Low‑importance

	England portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnglandWikipedia:WikiProject EnglandTemplate:WikiProject EnglandEngland-related
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

London Low‑importance

	London portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject London, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of London on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LondonWikipedia:WikiProject LondonTemplate:WikiProject LondonLondon-related
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

London Transport Low‑importance

	London transport portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject London Transport, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Transport in London on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.London TransportWikipedia:WikiProject London TransportTemplate:WikiProject London TransportLondon Transport
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Lea Interchange

Latest comment: 11 years ago6 comments3 people in discussion

Tower Transit did not 'gain the contracts of route N550 and N551'. The contracts were won in 2012 during First London period of ownership.^[1]^[2]

Tower Transit commenced operating routes N550 and N551 is a more accurate description of events.Mo7838 (talk) 07:35, 2 September 2013 (UTC)Reply

This might be old but the article still says "yet to commence". I would like to ask editors why my edits are being reverted when they are clearly facts.^[3]^[4] Marcnut1996 (talk) 22:54, 11 October 2014 (UTC)Reply

↑ Bus tender results Route N550 Transport for London 25 October 2012^{[dead link]}
↑ Bus tender results Route N551 Transport for London 25 October 2012^{[dead link]}
↑ Bus Fleet Bus Fleet, Retrieved 12 October 2014
↑ Tower Transit takes on Night Routes N550 and N551 - 19 September 2013 Tower Transit, Retrieved 12 October 2014

This is a higher level article. Each of the routes has its own wikilinked article where the details can be found. This and similar articles were bogged down by too much of this detailed information already covered in wikilinked articles, hence why rewritten to give a higher level view.

Also the text added is poorly worded: 'with the former already commenced in July 2013' is just bad grammar. Busgb (talk) 09:09, 12 October 2014 (UTC)Reply

If yours is better, please edit the article yourself to show correct facts. You do not stand bad grammar, I do not stand incorrect facts. Please also use at least one of the references that I have attempted to add. Marcnut1996 (talk) 09:13, 12 October 2014 (UTC)Reply

Care to enlighten as to which facts are incorrect? Of the cites provided, 2 are dead so of little value, and a third makes no mention of the changes proposed. You have made an attempt to change, and that's fine but these having been rejected by 3 editors, it is now time to accept the consensus and move on. Busgb (talk) 09:45, 12 October 2014 (UTC)Reply

Sorry I have been misreading. I didn't see the "had" in "had yet commenced", so I didn't know it refers to the time of handover. But I would like to say that is actually quite misleading, so is there a better way to word it? Marcnut1996 (talk) 10:19, 13 October 2014 (UTC)Reply