Talk:Total Politics
Add topicLatest comment: 18 years ago by Nunquam Dormio in topic Style issues
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
.svg){kind=small}
This is a valid description of a new British political magazine, for which there is no reason for deletion.
- Well actually there is. The article fails to indicate why this magazine is notable. It will also need reliable sources to verify notability. Please discuss at the Afd page here: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Total Politics – ukexpat (talk) 21:10, 14 July 2008 (UTC)
Sources for expansion
[edit]These were all revealed in a simply search, please remember that afds should only be submitted after an exhaustive search for sources.
--neon white talk 21:29, 14 July 2008 (UTC)
- I know that and I did search. I have no idea why none of these showed up. Afd withdrawn. – ukexpat (talk) 21:31, 14 July 2008 (UTC)
- Spelling error maybe? The article needs a complete rewrite in my opinion. I dont have time now, so i'm hoping someone else will start. --neon white talk 21:35, 14 July 2008 (UTC)
Style issues
[edit]A few style issues i'm not sure about. Should the entities mentioned in the first paragraph (MPs, MEPs, peers, members of the Scottish, Welsh and Northern Ireland assemblies, and councillors) be wikilinked or would that be overkill? Is there an infobox for magazines? --neon white talk 15:35, 15 July 2008 (UTC)
- found the infobox. Can we use an image of the cover? where do we stand on fair use copyright? --neon white talk 15:36, 15 July 2008 (UTC)
- Email the publishers. I'm sure they'll be delighted to give you permission to use an image. Nunquam Dormio (talk) 16:50, 15 July 2008 (UTC)
- found the infobox. Can we use an image of the cover? where do we stand on fair use copyright? --neon white talk 15:36, 15 July 2008 (UTC)