Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a22cc6747a4819ef

Jump to content

Talk:Tory Row

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 15 years ago by Betsythedevine in topic Brattle Street's Tory Row

Brattle Street's Tory Row

[edit]

Don't Merge (At least not yet). It has been proposed that this article be merged into the Brattle Street article. Tory Row is the nickname of a section of Brattle Street that has its own unique history and architecture. Brattle Street includes not only the colonial architecture of Tory Row but also Harvard's original the Episcopal Divinity School, a lot of interesting Victorian architecture, and the Modernist landmark of the old Design Research building. I created the Brattle Street article after the Tory Row one because I kept finding more good stuff I did not want to leave out. I would like to keep the two stubs separate and work on both for a while. That way, the fact that there is a lot more to say about Tory Row than about other aspects of Brattle Street won't overbalance the new article. betsythedevine (talk) 18:28, 17 January 2011 (UTC)Reply

Also, one of the houses on "Tory Row" does not have a Brattle Street address. It seems that although some people use Tory Row for a short segment of Brattle Street which includes very miscellaneous architecture, others reserve it for the seven Colonial mansions of that era, at least one of which doesn't have a Brattle Street address. betsythedevine (talk) 19:55, 17 January 2011 (UTC)Reply
No pressure from here, just a friendly suggestion. Nice work on both articles—thanks. Hertz1888 (talk) 21:59, 17 January 2011 (UTC)Reply
Thanks for the kind words -- and for thinking about what would work here. betsythedevine (talk) 04:01, 18 January 2011 (UTC)Reply