Talk:Top Cat

Archive 2003-2009

No summary of the main character

In the Characters section, there is no information given on the main character, Top Cat. Somebody might want to add a character summary for T.C. Safiel (talk) 03:49, 24 January 2010 (UTC)

It makes no sense for there not to be a character description of the main character, Top Cat. --Hoppybunny (talk) 18:56, 3 February 2011 (UTC)

'Film' section unsourced

While I'd be delighted if there are solid plans to 'reboot' Top Cat as a feature film, Wikipedia is not a blog and therefore requires reliable sources (see WP:RS) for this information. If none are forthcoming I'll see what I can come up with, and if I can't the section will have to go per WP:CRYSTAL. Thanks. Jusdafax 15:45, 19 May 2010 (UTC)

New Film in this 2011

A new film version of Top Cat is in post-production of a Mexico-Argentina co-production slated for release in September 2011. http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1821680/ ZirKarloz — Preceding unsigned comment added by 189.129.118.140 (talk) 08:22, 9 June 2011 (UTC)

Analysis section removed - NPOV violation

A few weeks ago I happened upon an 'Analysis' section in the Yogi Bear article which struck me as being out of place given that it contained an application of Critical Theory to a subject not related to this field. Since Critical Theory is a decidedly non-neutral paradigm this was very much out of place in the article on a cartoon bear. I also noticed the section had been removed and re-instated several times with justifications which themselves violated NPOV by claiming that the material was relevant to the subject. I therefore added a note to the talk page for the article and removed the section with the admonition to justify a re-instatement in some way. The section was re-instated without justification so I removed it a second time, again asking for a justification why this clear NPOV violation should be upheld. Given the strange combination of subject matter - critical theory applied to cartoon figures - I decided to check whether this NPOV violation occurred in other articles, which it turned out it does. Since Wikipedia is not a political action platform these sections have no place here. I will therefore remove the 'Analysis' section with the stated justification. If another editor wants to revert this removal he or she should justify this in some way by explaining why an expression of political activism has a place in a Wikipedia entry on a cartoon figure. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Yetanwiki (talk • contribs) 23:43, 6 July 2020 (UTC)

Wiki has a POV...what's the point in fighting it?71.162.113.226 (talk) 11:46, 12 December 2020 (UTC)

I think it matters whether or not it has a *moronic* POV, and morons are the primary champions of Critical Theory. It's a damn kids cartoon, it is not appropriate to insert various asinine pop psychology . — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:647:6480:b640:3406:b9da:bb5e:5df9 (talk) 02:32, 27 May 2025 (UTC)

End production

shouldnt this article have a secton about it's ending and or cancellation?

69.236.176.15 (talk) 05:42, 16 June 2011 (UTC)

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

• Top Cat Kellogg's commercial 1 (c. 1961).webm

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 11:15, 4 April 2021 (UTC)

The characters turned up in commercials for another bank prior to the Halifax...

..The Royal Bank of Scotland in 1983: https://topcat.fandom.com/wiki/The_Royal_Bank_of_Scotland David Smith9 (talk) 11:39, 20 November 2025 (UTC)