Talk:TootsieToy
Add topic | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
.jpg){kind=small}
Requested move
[edit]- The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the proposal was no consensus. --BDD (talk) 22:55, 17 December 2012 (UTC) (non-admin closure)
TootsieToy → Tootsietoy – The name Tootsietoy, without the second capitalized 'T' was used at the very beginning of the company, I believe, but the all lower case form of the name is more representative of the company appellation throughout the decades. I perused Google Images searching several pages down with "Tootsietoy logo", "Tootsietoy label" and "Tootsietoy package". Not one instance was found of "TootsieToy" (with the second capital 'T'. The name appears two different ways on packaging: 1) All caps (TOOTSIETOY), or 2) With first letter capitalized (Tootsietoy). The latter should be the name of the page according to custom Relisted. BDD (talk) 19:01, 10 December 2012 (UTC) --Cstevencampbell (talk) 00:40, 2 December 2012 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
Possible Name Change
[edit]I still support the name change the name of this article from TootsieToy to Tootsietoy as per the above reasoning and invite others to support here - so the proposal can be submitted again.--Cstevencampbell (talk) 00:30, 18 December 2012 (UTC)
Why does this page not use <ref>s?
[edit]Most articles use standard referencing wiki markup. Why does this article have to be different? I see no justification here. David Spector (talk) 19:51, 30 September 2017 (UTC)
- I would agree. The entire References” section could be eliminated if the inline cites were like the common usage of citing that is prevalent currently. THX1136 (talk) 23:59, 11 December 2022 (UTC)