Talk:Too-Rye-Ay
Add topicLatest comment: 3 years ago by 2601:203:4300:C280:4588:567B:1CBA:9711 in topic Genre
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Too-Rye-Ay article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the subject of the article. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to multiple WikiProjects. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Name of the album
[edit]The main article could be improved if a word or two were added explaining the meaning of the album's title. As a hybrid between jazz or 'soul', and folk music, in what way are these two forms of music crossed?
What does the album's title mean? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 198.177.27.11 (talk) 18:14, 17 March 2007 (UTC).
Ha..imagine that. I logged in here to ask the very same question. Surely someone knows? --Adoniscik 00:23, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
- I think it was just a catchy phrase from the song Come on Eileen. Vorbee (talk) 19:47, 22 May 2019 (UTC)
Genre
[edit]Whoever set the genre as new wave is retarded. However, I don't know what would be the best replacement for this. 70.48.100.137 (talk) 00:04, 12 March 2009 (UTC)
- Agreed. There's really no resemblance of new wave in the entire album. The genre could at least be set to what the band page genre is: "pop rock, blue-eyed soul, and Celtic folk". All of those are much, much closer to the sound of the album than new wave. The person who set it to that is obviously deaf. 2601:203:4300:C280:4588:567B:1CBA:9711 (talk) 05:53, 10 February 2023 (UTC)