Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a245a23db8d0f689

Jump to content

Talk:Toni Daggert

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 5 months ago by Jeffrey34555 in topic Requested move 21 February 2026

Fair use rationale for Image:Toni Daggert.jpg

[edit]

Image:Toni Daggert.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 11:59, 21 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

Probable AI text

[edit]

Hi - I added the AI-generated tag here, as the edits by AlphaBetaGamma123, here and elsewhere, display many indications of likely LLM use (both the signs on the page, and the impossibly quick rewrites they have done in quick succession in their contribs) and thus need review for accuracy, source-to-text integrity, original research, synthesis, other tone issues, etc. (They're blocked for sockpuppeting so cannot weigh in or confirm whether AI was used.) Gnomingstuff (talk) 06:13, 4 November 2025 (UTC)Reply

I have reverted the addition so now the issue is fixed - thank you for flagging it up! DaniloDaysOfOurLives (talk) 06:35, 4 November 2025 (UTC)Reply

Requested move 21 February 2026

[edit]
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: not moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) Jeffrey34555 (talk) 06:03, 28 February 2026 (UTC)Reply


Toni DaggertTonicha Daggert – The character was always credited as Tonicha and not Toni and soap character articles tend to be named by their credited names. I also believe that Tonicha is just as much the character's common name as Toni due to multiple sources here. BritishSoapFan (talk) 18:59, 21 February 2026 (UTC)Reply

Pinging Meena, Raintheone and JuneGloom07. I am currently unsure... DaniloDaysOfOurLives (talk) 07:05, 22 February 2026 (UTC)Reply
Oppose. She was regularly called Toni on-screen (I checked a few eps), Inside Soap uses Toni, the majority of newspapers in the British Newspaper Archive and The Free Library use Toni . I'm fairly sure Toni is her WP:COMMONNAME. - JuneGloom07 Talk 17:22, 22 February 2026 (UTC)Reply
Oppose I agree with June; I've always known her common name to be Toni per sources/onscreen referencing. – Meena14:59, 24 February 2026 (UTC)Reply
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.