Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a25c88ea2e2ecf79

Jump to content

Talk:Tomato

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 1 month ago by Chiswick Chap in topic Apocryphal stories
Good articleTomato has been listed as one of the Agriculture, food and drink good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
October 23, 2024Good article nomineeListed
February 17, 2026Good article reassessmentKept
On this day...A fact from this article was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "On this day..." column on September 28, 2004.
Current status: Good article

Tomatoes in Africa

[edit]

The section about tomatoes in the middle east has an image of tomatoes described as grown in Ghana (West Africa), which is not even close to the middle east There is aso no content about tomatoes in Africa Traci Deecee (talk) 09:22, 21 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

Well spotted. I've removed the off-topic image. The history by region is constructed from the available sources to make the main points for the article, which it seems to do. Chiswick Chap (talk) 18:12, 21 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

Apocryphal stories

[edit]

@Chiswick Chap: The whole business of tomatoes being considered poisonous has been debunked by Andrew F. Smith. The Cornè and R.G. Johnson narratives are part of this. That said, I wonder if we should mention the fakelore in this article, since many people will expect to see documentation of it on Wikipedia. It's covered in Robert Gibbon Johnson#Tomato story, but how will someone coming to this article find that? My experience is that preemptive mentions of legends -- clearly documenting that they are in fact apocryphal -- perform a valuable service in dissuading new editors from "correcting" the article; I call that "defensive editing" (cf. ), something like a defensive publication in patent law. --Macrakis (talk) 15:58, 24 June 2026 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for discussing. The article's history section mentions the assumption the fruit would be poisonous. It would be quite in order to have a subsidiary article on Myths of tomato's toxicity or some such title, in which case we could link it here with a brief summary. I think you are probably correct to remove the other myths from the United States section, though it might be that some such material would go into the brief summary, probably as part of the History section. Chiswick Chap (talk) 17:27, 24 June 2026 (UTC)Reply