Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a245e3cc9a56f49c

Jump to content

Talk:Tom Potter

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 6 years ago by Str1977 in topic Party

Untitled

[edit]

Fro an August 2004 deletion debate over this page see: Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Tom Potter


Potenitally useful news stories for use in rewrite:


The discussion of the Critical Mass incident has developed a POV problem IMHO. "celebration of cycling" reads like something out of their press releases. Opponents say it less a celebration of cycling than a condemnation of the automobile. Michael Hopcroft 00:15, 30 December 2005 (UTC)Reply

What party is he in? Democratic?

Clean up

[edit]

This article is mainly unsourced and most of it can be removed per WP:BLP. Additionally, the lead needs to be re-worked with much of the info moved to other sections once sourced. Aboutmovies (talk) 20:18, 21 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

Party

[edit]

What is his political party? Badagnani (talk) 04:02, 16 April 2008 (UTC)Reply

City offices are non-partisan. Aboutmovies (talk) 04:04, 16 April 2008 (UTC)Reply
OK, but it seems as though it might be important to at least mention his party somewhere. I would assume he's a Democrat, but I really don't know. StanHater (talk) 06:45, 20 November 2009 (UTC)Reply
All political offices are non-partisan though usually not the office-holders. Potter is no exception: he is indeed a Democrat. Str1977 (talk) 12:41, 26 July 2020 (UTC)Reply

Biased, unsourced article

[edit]

This article uses biased, POV wording, as if one of his supporters wrote this article. Additionally, there are numerous paragraphs that are entirely unsourced. This article needs a major overhaul. --1990'sguy (talk) 21:08, 19 April 2016 (UTC)Reply