Talk:Tom Fox (Quaker)

Untitled

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was move. —Nightstallion (?) ^{Seen this already?} 07:25, 3 April 2006 (UTC)

Requested move

Tom Fox (peacemaker) → Tom Fox (activist) – Blatant POV move by User:Beardedbaby (as their first edit, no less). Recommend speedy revert to original title.

---

Add *Support or *Oppose followed by an optional one-sentence explanation, then sign your opinion with ~~~~

• Support, as "activist" more generic than (incorrectly lowercased) "peacemaker". David Kernow 12:07, 29 March 2006 (UTC)
• Oppose, as Tom Fox was part of the Christian Peacemaker Teams, not Christian Activist Teams. --Alojmm 12:37, 29 March 2006 (UTC)
• Support Activist is more generic and neutral to me. "Peacemaker", while in the name of the orgisation, is somewhat POV, as self -titled group names often are. MartinRe 13:38, 29 March 2006 (UTC)
• Support --Ahc 14:27, 29 March 2006 (UTC)
• Abstain It was originally (peacemaker) and became (activist) without the necessary level of discussion; this should be used as an opportunity to discuss the merits of the clarification of 'which' Tom Fox the article refers to. However, I would support moving it back if there was some way to indicate that he was more than an activist, like perhaps "(aidworker)". Artsygeek 20:46, 29 March 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Info box

I added the infobox to the page tonight after it was requested by the folks working on the biography project. There are a couple fields that should be completed if anyone knows the information; I'd also like to see if others have a better value for "occupation". --Ahc 03:26, 3 March 2007 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with File:Tomfox111.jpg

The image File:Tomfox111.jpg is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here. In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Please check

• That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article.
• That this article is linked to from the image description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --15:31, 2 November 2008 (UTC)