Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a2499402b906b7b5

Jump to content

Talk:Tom Barrack

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 5 months ago by ~2026-90336-1 in topic Relationship with Epstein

2016 Election Engagement and vouch for Paul Manafort

[edit]

Considering this, http://www.nytimes.com/2016/08/20/us/politics/paul-manafort-resigns-donald-trump.html; perhaps a section in the article would be aprapho. --Wikipietime (talk) 14:51, 19 August 2016 (UTC)Reply

Wall Street Journal

[edit]

Wikipedia is not a journal of current news items. I removed the statement from Wall Street Journal. Also, I found that Barrack is not the target of the probe: https://www.nytimes.com/aponline/2018/12/17/us/ap-us-trump-inaugural-probe.htmlBB8ball (talk) 17:56, 27 December 2018 (UTC)Reply

Neutrality

[edit]

Please remember this is an encyclopedia, and should at least appear to not be so heavily biased in language... Genetikbliss (talk) 05:31, 23 February 2019 (UTC)Reply

Everyone in the sections above

[edit]

Can now STFU. Thank you. (except for wikipietime, obv.)

To add to article

[edit]

Shouldn't Matthew Grimes be mentioned in the text of this article? 173.88.246.138 (talk) 04:39, 3 August 2021 (UTC)Reply

Colony NorthStar merger section

[edit]

The Colony NorthStar merger section seems way too long and off topic, discussing a corporate merger and barely mentioning the article's subject. SilverhairedHarry (talk) 16:10, 13 November 2025 (UTC)Reply

Relationship with Epstein

[edit]

Seems this would be newsworthy.

Epstein Emailed Trump’s Now Ambassador Asking for Photos of Child ~2025-37561-84 (talk) 13:49, 2 December 2025 (UTC)Reply

It is utterly ridiculous, unprofessional, and unencyclopedic that, months after the above comment was added to this "Talk" page, the word Jeffrey Epstein can still be found 0 times in the current version of this article. Here's a new source showing that Tom Barrack was in contact with Jeffrey Epstein for years after Epstein's conviction for sex trafficking in 2008. Source: https://www.cbsnews.com/news/tom-barrack-jeffrey-epstein-files/ Let's do better. ~2026-90336-1 (talk) 20:12, 14 February 2026 (UTC)Reply
Added. ~2026-90336-1 (talk) 20:25, 14 February 2026 (UTC)Reply