Talk:To Your Eternity/GA1
Add topicLatest comment: 5 years ago by Link20XX in topic GA Review
GA Review
[edit]| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Link20XX (talk · contribs) 15:57, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
Marking this for review. Will start soon. Link20XX (talk) 15:57, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
@Tintor2: This was a fascinating article to read through, and will be good enough with the few points below being addressed.
Lead
[edit]- This may be nitpicky on my end, but "selling multiple copies" could mean just 2, maybe the word "many" or something of the like would be a better fit?
- Revised
Characters
[edit]- The English voice actors for child Gugu and Rean need a source.
- Removed. Not even Behind the Voice Actors confirm it. Neither the actors' twitter accounts.
- The character descriptions for Mia, Oopa, Sandel, and Uroy are all just the same one line. If that same line is all that can be said about them, are they worth mentioning at all?
- Removed
Production
[edit]- It is entirely possible that this is due to machine translation issues, but I can't find the statement "Each volume cover represents a character's dream such as the first one, which depicts the unnamed youth finding freedom. Volume three depicts Fushi's dream, which is to live happily and peacefully with everyone" in the Kono Manga interview.
- Revised.
Media
[edit]- "having announced it on May 23, 2016", isn't supported by the source, since the ANN article dates to May 24, 2016. Is this a typo?
- Removed
- There isn't a source in this section for the Japanese volume count. Perhaps it should be added?
- Added.
Reception
[edit]- This isn't a critique, but a question. Do you have a reason to consider Manga Mexico and Fantasy Mundo as reliable sources?
- Both sites cite the original publisher for their region's release and are linked with sites that sell the volumes among other type of merchandising. Hope this helps.
That is all. Link20XX (talk) 23:09, 14 July 2021 (UTC) @Link20XX: Thanks for the review. Ping me if there is another issue.Tintor2 (talk) 23:42, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
- @Tintor2: With the changes, the article satisfies the good article criteria. Happy to Pass this review. Link20XX (talk) 23:48, 14 July 2021 (UTC)