Talk:Tina Vidal-Duart

Targeted Slander

An individual contributor, Tuesdan Andrew, has been active in targeting Mrs. Tina Vida-Duart over the last month. It is clear his focus is negative and not in the interest of objectivity. Here are some clear examples: 1. References 5,6,7,8,9 are not valid links. 3. References 11, 12 are not valid news sources. 4. Reference 13 is being used improperly as a source. 4. References 14, 15 are not legit news sources. 5. References 14,15,16 are being used improperly as sources.

The entire section on Fraud Allegations is being supported and referenced by articles that are either non-existent, linked from biased sources, or do not support the text being used in the Wiki page. Arasita (talk) 01:06, 1 March 2026 (UTC)

Concern Regarding Reliability and Bias of Sources #10 and #12

I would like to raise a concern regarding the reliability and appropriateness of references #10 and #12 currently cited in this article. Both of these sources appear to originate from advocacy websites and campaign-style materials rather than independent journalistic or academic publications. For example, one of the cited sources appears to come from our-cash.com, which presents itself as a political advocacy campaign targeting Carlos Duart and Tina Vidal-Duart. The content on that site uses explicitly accusatory and advocacy-oriented language (e.g., describing the subjects as “disaster profiteers cashing in on our suffering”) and encourages readers to participate in petitions and messaging campaigns directed at the individuals. This raises several concerns under Wikipedia’s sourcing policies: 1. WP:RS – Reliable Sources Wikipedia requires that material, particularly for biographies, be supported by reliable, independent sources with editorial oversight. Advocacy campaign websites or activist pages typically do not meet this standard because they lack editorial review and fact-checking processes. The site referenced above appears to be a political or advocacy campaign page, not a news organization, academic publication, or recognized investigative outlet. 2. WP:BLP – Biographies of Living Persons Because this article concerns a living person, the standard for sourcing is especially strict. The policy states that contentious or potentially damaging material must be supported by high-quality reliable sources. Advocacy or campaign websites that explicitly target individuals generally do not meet the standard required for BLP content. 3. WP:UNDUE / WP:FRINGE Using sources created by organizations actively campaigning against a subject risks giving undue weight to partisan or advocacy perspectives that are not reflected in reliable secondary coverage. 4. Primary Campaign Material vs Independent Reporting The referenced pages appear to be primary advocacy materials rather than independent reporting. Wikipedia policy generally discourages using such sources to establish factual claims about individuals.

I propose that references #10 and #12 be removed and the entire section that is written using those sources for support be removed. Arasita (talk) 21:44, 15 March 2026 (UTC)

Invalid Sources

Source #2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9 are not valid sources and should be removed along with the content that has been written based on those sources. Arasita (talk) 21:52, 15 March 2026 (UTC)

Concern regarding reliability and independence of Sources #10 and #12

I would like to raise a concern regarding the reliability and independence of sources #10 and #12 currently cited in the article. Both sources were published on the same day and appear to rely on or repeat information originating from advocacy websites that specifically target Tina Vidal-Duart and companies associated with the CDR group. One of the commonly referenced sources in this ecosystem is our-cash.com, which appears to be part of a protest campaign run by the advocacy organization Florida Rising. That site contains explicitly activist messaging directed at the Duart family and related businesses. This raises several concerns under Wikipedia sourcing policies: WP:BLP – Biographies of Living Persons Because this article concerns a living person, Wikipedia requires that potentially contentious material be supported by high-quality reliable sources. Content derived from advocacy campaigns or activist organizations targeting a specific individual may not meet the reliability standard required for BLP articles. WP:RS – Reliable Sources The sources in question appear to draw on campaign-style advocacy material rather than independent reporting. Wikipedia generally requires independent sources with editorial oversight. If a source’s reporting is largely based on activist campaign materials created to pressure or criticize a specific subject, its reliability for biographical claims may be questionable. WP:INDEPENDENT / WP:UNDUE If multiple articles published on the same day rely on the same advocacy campaign or protest website, this raises questions about source independence. Wikipedia generally prefers independent secondary coverage, rather than sources that amplify material originating from an organized campaign against a subject. Proposed action Given these concerns, I suggest that sources #10 and #12 be reviewed for reliability. If they are primarily based on advocacy campaign material (such as our-cash.com or similar activist sites), they may not meet the sourcing standard required for BLP content and could be: • removed, or

• replaced with independent reliable coverage (major news outlets, government reports, or publications with editorial oversight)

My goal here is simply to ensure the article adheres to Wikipedia’s sourcing standards for biographies of living persons, particularly regarding independence and reliability of sources. Arasita (talk) 22:21, 15 March 2026 (UTC)