Talk:Timing advance

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Timing advance. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20110123014240/http://www.allbusiness.com:80/electronics/computer-electronics-manufacturing/6838169-1.html to http://www.allbusiness.com/electronics/computer-electronics-manufacturing/6838169-1.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 19:21, 11 January 2016 (UTC)

Any equivalents in later standards?

Mentioning similar features in newer standards that can determine the distance from the base station (if they exist) likely makes sense ~2026-32241-87 (talk) 08:11, 30 May 2026 (UTC)

Article Review 1

Thank you very much for this interesting topic! I just added some wikilinks and did minor adjustments to the wording.

I would like add two tiny recommendations, which is first of all: In one paragraph, you are using numbers as text and you say "kilometers", "microseconds", ... and in the next, you are using it as formulae and with the abbreviations. For the reader's flow, it would be a little bit easier if you chose one format. Another optional adjustment could be to add a picture - I know, not an easy topic for that, but it could look nice.

Other than that, thanks for your contribution! Nc2026 (talk) 12:57, 3 July 2026 (UTC)

Reviewer 2

Hello, I noticed that in the GSM paragraph the numpers and unit of measurements are inserted with a different formatting than the rest of the page. For the rest, all good. Nice work! Mêtis-Kitsune (talk) 13:41, 3 July 2026 (UTC)

Article Review 3

Thank you very much for your contribution.

One small recommendation; I would try to add images. I know that it might be difficult regarding the topic but that could really improve the readability.

Thank you! MatteoG1999 (talk) 13:17, 3 July 2026 (UTC)