Talk:Timeline of Microsoft

This article was nominated for deletion on 13 March 2017. The result of the discussion was no consensus.

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Microsoft, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.MicrosoftWikipedia:WikiProject MicrosoftTemplate:WikiProject MicrosoftMicrosoft

United States: Washington / Seattle Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Washington (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Washington - Seattle (assessed as Mid-importance).

Computing: Software Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Software (assessed as Low-importance).

Technology

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Technology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TechnologyWikipedia:WikiProject TechnologyTemplate:WikiProject TechnologyTechnology

The Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use require that editors disclose their "employer, client, and affiliation" with respect to any paid contribution; see WP:PAID. For advice about reviewing paid contributions, see WP:COIRESPONSE.

Simfish (talk · contribs) has been paid by Vipul. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Vipul https://contractwork.vipulnaik.com/worker.php?worker=Alex+K.+Chen https://github.com/vipulnaik/contractwork/blob/master/contributor-lists/akc-list.mediawiki

TechCrunch

Latest comment: 9 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

The validity of TechCrunch as a RS has been brought up repeatedly at RSN, and the advice of several respected editors seems salient here. Refer to Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 221#Are news articles written by TechCrunch staff considered RS?. There is no clear consensus to rule TechCrunch out automatically, but as it isn't rock solid, it should not be used in a broad overview such as this. Especially when there are concerns as to how specific events in the timeline (acquisitions in this case) are chosen. - Bri (talk) 18:01, 4 April 2017 (UTC)Reply

This page was redesigned at the edge.

A page that knows where it met you.

Talk:Timeline of Microsoft

TechCrunch