Talk:Timelesz

Not notable?

A user added the "does not meet Wikipedia's notability guideline for music" to Sexy Zone's page however I feel the group does acoroding to WP:MUS. They meet several of the criteria including: 'Has been the subject of multiple, non-trivial, published works appearing in sources that are reliable and are independent from the musician or ensemble itself.' The group have been featured on the cover of mutiple popular japanese magazines including Myojo, Popolo and duet. They also meet this critia: "Has had a single or album on any country's national music chart." At number 1, "Has been a featured subject of a substantial broadcast segment across a national radio or TV network" The group has been heavily featued on both a show about the vollyball world cup and A cable reality show.

I think the article could have better refrences, since most english info on the is only fan info it is a chalenge, but I think they count as notable. So can I take out the WP:MUS sign? DSQ (talk) 11:30, 29 November 2011 (UTC)

You will need to post this information on the talk page of the article, so others interested in the subject can weigh in. However, on the face of it it seems they do indeed meet the notability criteria. --Saddhiyama (talk) 14:47, 29 November 2011 (UTC)

Okay, I'll move this thread. Thanks for the help. :) DSQ (talk) 15:56, 29 November 2011 (UTC)

Timelesz discography

I would like to start a page for timelesz, with the 3 and 8-member eras, leaving the existing page Sexy Zone discography to cover the era of Sexy Zone only. Is there any problem with this request? SugaShikaoFans (talk) 09:05, 18 February 2025 (UTC)