Talk:Time Stand Still
Add topicLatest comment: 4 days ago by Ortizesp in topic Requested move 26 September 2026
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
| ||||||||
Requested move 26 September 2026
[edit]
 | It has been proposed in this section that multiple pages be renamed and moved. A bot will list this discussion on the requested moves current discussions subpage within an hour of this tag being placed. The discussion may be closed 7 days after being opened, if consensus has been reached (see the closing instructions). Please base arguments on article title policy, and keep discussion succinct and civil. Please use {{subst:requested move}}. Do not use {{requested move/dated}} directly. |
– The song has far more references and page visits than the album, and therefore is a better candidate for the primary topic. Emcgonigle (talk) 23:36, 26 September 2026 (UTC)
- Support Time Stand Still → Time Stand Still (album) per nomination and oppose primary topic swap Time Stand Still (song) → Time Stand Still. The Time Stand Still link should either become a disambiguation page or it can redirect to the Time Stands Still dab page which already lists both entries. —Roman Spinner (talk • contribs) 00:16, 27 September 2026 (UTC)
- Support the album has 218 views but the song has 3,245 and The Collection has 1[] so clearly the album isn't primary but usage though a DAB would be fine. Crouch, Swale (talk) 17:36, 27 September 2026 (UTC)
- Support 1st, oppose 2nd, create DAB at basename. No PRIMARYTOPIC.--Ortizesp (talk) 15:47, 28 September 2026 (UTC)