Talk:Time Cube

Skip to table of contents

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Time Cube article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the subject of the article.

Add new text under old text.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Start a new topic

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17: 31 days

Websites: Computing Low‑importance

	This article is part of WikiProject Websites, an attempt to create and link together articles about the major websites on the web. To participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page.WebsitesWikipedia:WikiProject WebsitesTemplate:WikiProject WebsitesWebsites
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Computing.

Internet culture Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Internet culture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of internet culture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Internet cultureWikipedia:WikiProject Internet cultureTemplate:WikiProject Internet cultureInternet culture

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Internet culture To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : View all requested internet culture articles
Expand : Pick an article from here or here
Photo : Category:Internet culture articles needing images
Stubs : All stubs are located here
Other : Category:Internet self-classification codes (!?); Try to get YouTube to FA; Tag all articles you find with {{WikiProject Internet culture}}
- See also Category:Internet culture articles needing attention

Skepticism Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Skepticism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of science, pseudoscience, pseudohistory, conspiracy theories, and skepticism related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SkepticismWikipedia:WikiProject SkepticismTemplate:WikiProject SkepticismSkepticism
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Alternative views Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Alternative views, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of significant alternative views in every field, from the sciences to the humanities. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion.Alternative viewsWikipedia:WikiProject Alternative viewsTemplate:WikiProject Alternative viewsAlternative views
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Time Cube is a former featured article candidate. Please view the links under Article milestones below to see why the nomination was archived. For older candidates, please check the archive.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
January 24, 2004	Articles for deletion	Kept
February 3, 2004	Articles for deletion	Kept
March 30, 2005	Featured article candidate	Not promoted
April 26, 2005	Articles for deletion	Kept
October 26, 2006	Articles for deletion	Kept
October 29, 2008	Articles for deletion	Kept
March 16, 2010	Articles for deletion	Kept
July 29, 2010	Articles for deletion	Kept
Current status: Former featured article candidate

The subject of this article is controversial and content may be in dispute. When editing this article, be bold, but not reckless. Feel free to try to improve it, but don't take it personally if your changes are reversed; instead, use the talk page to discuss them. Content must be written from a neutral point of view. Include citations when adding content and consider tagging or removing unsourced information.

The content of Gene Ray was merged into Time Cube. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists. For the discussion at that location, see its talk page.

Agreement

Latest comment: 2 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

It appears that there is one statement by this Ray guy that everyone can agree on: "Ray asserted repeatedly and variously that the academic world had not taken Time Cube seriously." ←Baseball Bugs ^{What's up, Doc?} carrots→ 22:55, 25 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

Diagnosis with schizophrenia?

Latest comment: 1 year ago1 comment1 person in discussion

> In one paragraph, Ray claimed that his own wisdom "so antiquates known knowledge" that a psychiatrist examining his behavior diagnosed him with schizophrenia.

The paragraph cited:

> My wisdom so antiquates known knowledge, that a psychiatrist examining my behavior, eccentric by his academic single corner knowledge, knows no course other than to judge me schizoprenic.

But the quote doesn't clearly claim that anyone "diagnosed" him. It could be read that way, but the use of the present tense suggests a hypothetical psychiatrist who Ray would expect to be diagnosed by. 83.105.3.121 (talk) 15:14, 2 January 2025 (UTC)Reply

Religious beliefs?

Latest comment: 1 year ago1 comment1 person in discussion

We shouldn't put that the Time Cube Theory is a religious belief? It's a theory that has Mama (Primary God) and 4 entities (Jesus, Socrates, Einstein and Clinton) as, arguably, divine beings. (From what I understood.) So it shouldn't be considered Pseudo-Cientific Theory / Religous Beliefs? João L. Paiter (talk) 17:51, 14 March 2025 (UTC)Reply

MIT talk

Note that the information provided about this talk is inaccurate. I was there, and several of my fellow students tried to disprove him, one even bringing a physical model of some sort as a prop to support his explanation. Since Ray's theory isn't based on fact or logic, however, he declared that no one had successfully disproved his theory. I have no idea how to fix this in the article as I know of no supporting source we can cite that says so.

"Word animal" listed at Redirects for discussion

Latest comment: 1 month ago1 comment1 person in discussion

The redirect Word animal has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2026 June 26 § Word animal until a consensus is reached. 1234qwer 1234qwer 4 12:28, 26 June 2026 (UTC)Reply

This page was redesigned at the edge.

A page that knows where it met you.