Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a23cf18baad42780

Jump to content

Talk:Tiger I

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 1 month ago by ArmorEnthusiast131 in topic Australian Restoration

Orgin of name "Tiger"

[edit]

This article claims it came from Porsche, yet there is no sourcing for this anywhere on the internet. The earliest reference comes from Wa Pruf 6, in a Feb 1942 document where it is referred too as Tiger. This should be deleted entirely and rewritten to support this. MarkusDorazio (talk) 19:10, 27 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

92 AP and HE rounds

[edit]

In the infobox it says the armament is 92 AP and HE rounds. I'm guessing that that number is the maximum load? Most of the times a tank would not and would not want to roll around with the maximum load though either because not enough available ammunition, weight, and higher risk of blowing up when hit. NamelessLameless (talk) 17:22, 12 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

Official designation

[edit]

Should something like "officially Panzerkampfwagen VI Ausführung E (abbreviated as Pz.Kpfw. VI Ausf. E) with ordanance designations 182 and later 181" be added to the first paragraph of the article to make it more in line with other articles about the German big cats? Or is this unnecessary? Bean guy2 (talk) 11:51, 16 May 2025 (UTC)Reply

It wasn't ever officially called that. By the time it was referred to as Ausf. E rather than Ausf. H1 it was referred to as Panzerkampfwagen Tiger, not Panzerkampfwagen VI. The way that the Sd Kfz numbers are referred to also strike me as odd - they were part of the name later in the war, and as it is written right now, it would seem to me to raise more questions than it answers as to what it means. Christian Ankerstjerne (talk) 19:23, 22 May 2025 (UTC)Reply

Australian Restoration

[edit]

The Australian Armor and Artillery Museum is planning on restoring their Tiger to running condition with a full interior, and the article should reflect this when they finish. 2600:4040:5AE1:6600:8D5B:A9EB:BC0E:4F9 (talk) 10:58, 17 August 2025 (UTC)Reply

Sorry for the late reply- I follow them too, but they've said they're not ready to restore it fully yet. They don't have the parts yet. If I recall they're planning on using a newly fabricated transmission, and original steering. ArmorEnthusiast131 (talk) 23:17, 15 June 2026 (UTC)Reply