Talk:TidalCycles

This article was nominated for deletion on 18 January 2022. The result of the discussion was keep.

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Electronic music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Electronic music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Electronic musicWikipedia:WikiProject Electronic musicTemplate:WikiProject Electronic musicelectronic music
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Software (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by Free and open-source software (assessed as Low-importance).

Removed key references

Latest comment: 4 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

Part of an edit requested by an editor with a conflict of interest has been implemented. [see below]

Please note I am the original author of this free/open source software project although do not financially benefit from it.

Specific text to be added or removed: I'd like the references here to be reinstated (I think the second one already has) https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=TidalCycles&diff=1066330027&oldid=1063278331
Reason for the change: These are key references to peer reviewed papers giving important background for this free/open source software. They were removed as with the claim of being 'CoI' as I am both creator of this software and author of the papers. But as far as I remember, I didn't add them here in the first place. I have a lot of edits to this page, but those edits are almost all uncontroversial - updating metadata such as the version number. I would revert this myself but I suppose that could be seen as controversial. For what it's worth, the account deleting these references seems to have been created for the sole purpose of [content] from many pages vaguely related to me, and appears to be a case of WP:SPASOCK. They removed these references before requesting an AfD on the basis that the page doesn't have enough references..
References supporting change: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/TidalCycles

I readded two of the references, which were cited in the very first revision. One was added by you diff which I did not restore. RoseCherry64 (talk) 12:06, 25 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for taking the time to do that, and fair enough. Yaxu (talk) 13:16, 25 January 2022 (UTC)Reply