Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a2334e646bb2c6fa

Jump to content

Talk:Thuringothyris

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 11 years ago by Gretarsson in topic Thuringothyris is not the basalmost captorhinid

Thuringothyris is not the basalmost captorhinid

[edit]

A noval phylogenic study of primitive reptile relationships by Müller & Reisz in 2006 recovered Thuringothyris as a sister taxon of the Captorhinidae, and therefore, by definition, Thuringothyris represents the basalmost known captorhinid.

No, there is no definition ever published that justifies Thuringothyris to be assigned to the Captorhinidae. Müller & Reisz (2006) always speak of a “Thurigothyris/captorhinid clade” implying that Thuringothyris is not considered a member of the Captorhinidae. They explicitly state that Thuringothyris does not have “swollen” neural arches, a feature that is shared by all Captorhinids whose postcranial skeleton is known. Hence, these authors imply an apomorphy-based definition of the Captorhinidae that excludes all basal eureptiles without such “swollen” neural arches. Consequently, Thuringothyris is a basal eureptile outside the Captorhinidae, despite the fact that it is geologically younger than Concordia. --Gretarsson (talk) 22:07, 16 July 2015 (UTC)Reply