Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a23075e0c914cf4e

Jump to content

Talk:Three stripes

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 11 months ago by Someone-123-321 in topic "///" listed at Redirects for discussion

When was "three stripes" first "registered"?

[edit]

The opening line of the article reads:

Three stripes is a registered trademark of Adidas since 1949.[1]

The reference points to this dead link. The current Adidas history webpage says:

On August 18, 1949, Adi Dassler started over again at the age of 49, registered the “Adi Dassler adidas Sportschuhfabrik” and set to work with 47 employees in the small town of Herzogenaurach. On the same day, he registered a shoe that included the registration of the soon-to-become-famous adidas 3-Stripes. From humble beginnings to a global success story – which was accelerated by a miracle …

This link further explains:

On 31 March 1949, this shoe was registered, along with the following three shoes, as a registered design through the patent lawyer Dr Wetzel.

A design is not the same as a trademark. A registration for the design of a shoe that contains three stripes is not the same as a trademark for three stripes. Thus, the original claim is not supported. sroc 💬 23:13, 4 November 2013 (UTC)Reply

I have conducted top-line searches of:

all using the Vienna code 26.11.99 ("Three lines") under the name "Adidas". The searches include various logos/images containing the three stripes, but not the three stripes device alone. It therefore does not appear to be a "registered trademark", but may still be regarded as an (unregistered) "trademark". sroc 💬 23:34, 4 November 2013 (UTC)Reply

"///" listed at Redirects for discussion

[edit]

The redirect /// has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 August 5 § /// until a consensus is reached. User:Someone-123-321 (I contribute, Talk page so SineBot will shut up) 08:09, 5 August 2025 (UTC)Reply