Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a21beb831aaa2da2

Jump to content

Talk:Three cups problem

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 12 years ago by 132.199.99.15 in topic Impossibility proof

Traditional solvable version

[edit]

Traditionally, the solvable version is solved in three moves, to prevent people from realizing that the solvable version is trivial. That way the deception often goes unnoticed.

the move series is

Flip A and B

Flip A and C

Flip A and B

Then the middle cup is turned face down to give the other person the unsolvable version.

When the other person invariably ends up with them face down again, you turn the middle one up, then solve the solvable version for them, using the mirror image of the solution shown above, then turn the middle face down again. 74.211.58.183 (talk)

Impossibility proof

[edit]

Why does the proof need to have abstract notation? Additionally, why not just address every case, as it shows the symmetry of the system (up vs down)?

0 cups up → 2 cups up; 1 cups up → {1 or 3} cups up; 2 cups up → {0 or 2} cups up; 3 cups up → 1 cups up

It's then clear that the parity of the cups never changes, and so you can't get from one cup upright to two. 132.199.99.15 (talk) 13:54, 11 February 2014 (UTC)Reply