Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a2644cafef43a3ae

Jump to content

Talk:Three Gorges Dam

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 7 months ago by ~2025-43413-86 in topic Forced relocation?

Good articleThree Gorges Dam has been listed as one of the Engineering and technology good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
On this day... Article milestones
DateProcessResult
January 20, 2008Good article nomineeListed
November 28, 2009Good article reassessmentDelisted
January 7, 2011Good article reassessmentListed
On this day... Facts from this article were featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "On this day..." column on December 14, 2011, and December 14, 2014.
Current status: Good article

Misleading

[edit]

The sources for the claim that 31 million people were displaced is incorrect and greatly exaggerated. Sources:

https://www.montana.edu/rmaher/engr125_fl06/Three%20Gorges%20Dam.pdf?

https://www.nationalgeographic.com/science/article/china-three-gorges-dam-how-big?

https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1193&context=nebanthro& 69.178.91.214 (talk) 13:21, 18 December 2024 (UTC)Reply

Just made an account to complain about this. My best guess is that the 31 million number was mistakenly pulled from Chongqing's total population which is mentioned later in the article. Hoping this boosts your comment! Johnmatulis19 (talk) 18:26, 3 January 2025 (UTC)Reply
@Johnmatulis19 I agree. After doing some research, 31 million is far beyond any credible estimates and likely confuses broader migration trends in China with direct displacements caused by the dam. Officially reported figures is around 1.3 million to 1.4 million. Some independent estimates are higher at up to 2 million. But 31 million is an unprofessional exaggeration. The article needs better scrutiny on these figures. Smalledi (talk) 03:05, 22 February 2025 (UTC)Reply
Yes, they are clearly wrong. My guess is that some past editor likely misinterpreted or exaggerated these numbers by attributing general population movements in the whole region to the dam's construction. Chongqing, a rapidly growing mega city, which is near the dam, has had mass urban migration over the decades due to economic policies, large scale industrialization - and all these factors are clearly separate from the dam in driving demographic shifts. I have since corrected and cited reliable sources from CNN, University of California, Science Direct and gave their figures which all of them are significantly less than 31 million, albeit still big at around 1.3 million. Thank you both for the good catch and bringing needed awareness to double check for accuracy. Smalledi (talk) 03:38, 22 February 2025 (UTC)Reply

Forced relocation?

[edit]

Why no mention of use of triads and violence, and the result of the relocation to unsafe areas that lead to mass drowning of children in landslide, which led to the abandonment of the 1 child policy? We don’t need prc propaganda? All of this was widely researched and reported… ~2025-43413-86 (talk) 15:17, 28 December 2025 (UTC)Reply