Talk:Three Gorges Dam
Add topic
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Three Gorges Dam article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the subject of the article. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
| Archives: 1, 2Auto-archiving period: 2 months |
| The content of Environmental impact of the Three Gorges Dam was merged into Three Gorges Dam on 2011-12-30. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists. For the discussion at that location, see its talk page. |
| Three Gorges Dam has been listed as one of the Engineering and technology good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||
| This It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Misleading
[edit]The sources for the claim that 31 million people were displaced is incorrect and greatly exaggerated. Sources:
https://www.montana.edu/rmaher/engr125_fl06/Three%20Gorges%20Dam.pdf?
https://www.nationalgeographic.com/science/article/china-three-gorges-dam-how-big?
https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1193&context=nebanthro& 69.178.91.214 (talk) 13:21, 18 December 2024 (UTC)
- Just made an account to complain about this. My best guess is that the 31 million number was mistakenly pulled from Chongqing's total population which is mentioned later in the article. Hoping this boosts your comment! Johnmatulis19 (talk) 18:26, 3 January 2025 (UTC)
- @Johnmatulis19 I agree. After doing some research, 31 million is far beyond any credible estimates and likely confuses broader migration trends in China with direct displacements caused by the dam. Officially reported figures is around 1.3 million to 1.4 million. Some independent estimates are higher at up to 2 million. But 31 million is an unprofessional exaggeration. The article needs better scrutiny on these figures. Smalledi (talk) 03:05, 22 February 2025 (UTC)
- Yes, they are clearly wrong. My guess is that some past editor likely misinterpreted or exaggerated these numbers by attributing general population movements in the whole region to the dam's construction. Chongqing, a rapidly growing mega city, which is near the dam, has had mass urban migration over the decades due to economic policies, large scale industrialization - and all these factors are clearly separate from the dam in driving demographic shifts. I have since corrected and cited reliable sources from CNN, University of California, Science Direct and gave their figures which all of them are significantly less than 31 million, albeit still big at around 1.3 million. Thank you both for the good catch and bringing needed awareness to double check for accuracy. Smalledi (talk) 03:38, 22 February 2025 (UTC)
Forced relocation?
[edit]Why no mention of use of triads and violence, and the result of the relocation to unsafe areas that lead to mass drowning of children in landslide, which led to the abandonment of the 1 child policy? We don’t need prc propaganda? All of this was widely researched and reported… ~2025-43413-86 (talk) 15:17, 28 December 2025 (UTC)
- Wikipedia good articles
- Engineering and technology good articles
- GA-Class level-4 vital articles
- Wikipedia level-4 vital articles in Technology
- GA-Class vital articles in Technology
- GA-Class China-related articles
- Top-importance China-related articles
- GA-Class China-related articles of Top-importance
- WikiProject China articles
- GA-Class energy articles
- High-importance energy articles
- GA-Class Dam articles
- Top-importance Dam articles
- WikiProject Dams articles
- GA-Class Environment articles
- Mid-importance Environment articles