Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a22845362cd1aedd

Jump to content

Talk:Three Block War

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 19 years ago by Pdfpdf in topic Merger with Strategic Corporal

Merger with Strategic Corporal

[edit]

I disagree with the proposed merger into Strategic Corporal. While a "strategic corporal" may be an important leader in a Three Block War, the two terms are quite independent. --JD79 02:56, 30 November 2006 (UTC)Reply

Perhaps you misunderstood. The tag referred to merging Strategic Corporal *into* the article Three Block War. The Three Block War is the main context of the Strategic Corporal. At present it seems likely to remain a stub and nothing more. If it expands further later, such that it merits a separate article, it can be split again. But for now, it is not well-linked (despite searching the rest of articles for this phrase), and probably won't grow. --Rifleman 82 03:21, 30 November 2006 (UTC)Reply
I also disagree with the proposed merger, and I disagree that the Three Block War is the *main* context of the Strategic Corporal. As JD79 says, the two terms are quite independent. It (the Three Block War) was the *original* context, but with time its use has evolved. The strategic corporal (or even the strategic private) can perform acts in front of a camera that have nothing to do with a Three Block War, but have enormous strategic ramifications. I agree this may not quite be what Krulak had in mind when he penned his article in 1999, but these days the term is more widely used than its original context. Pdfpdf 07:36, 25 March 2007 (UTC)Reply