Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a249663bffa64af4

Jump to content

Talk:Thought

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 6 days ago by Phlsph7 in topic Neurobiological basis of Thought

Thought as an abstract form

[edit]

The brain generates and uses countless abstract forms/objects. The elemental abstract forms are thoughts (as elemental organic forms are cells), the most complex are skills, sciences, languages etc. Abstract forms/objects, although non-dimensional (shapeless), are energetically real (not 'imaginary'), as material forms are real (telekinesis, moving material objects/forms with thoughts, is a direct proof of that). Quantum physicist David Bohm (see: Thought as a System) among many others, also realized this, and dedicated many of his efforts bringing up the importance of thoughts to humankind: "Thought runs you. Thought, however, gives false info that you are running it, that you are the one who controls thought. Whereas actually thought is the one which controls each one of us..."

According to Rupert Sheldrake every abstract form, like every organic form, relates to a certain morphic field.

Unsigned comment

[edit]

I came to this entry hoping to see various psychophysical, epigenetic, or perhaps esoteric(new thought, rosecrucians, theosophists etc.) hypotheses to the question "what is thought?" Surely a thought or abstraction is a thing composed of matter an energy. I found the entry to be quite unsatisfying.

merge with idea

[edit]

what's the difference between a thought and an idea?!

That answer is online here - http://cnx.org/content/m14812/latest/

also, many differences and the relationship between thoughts, emotions and feelings is discussed in my online book "The Psychology of Emotions, Feelings and Thoughts" online here - http://cnx.org/content/m14358/latest/ —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 71.248.163.183 (talk)

Thinking effects

[edit]

Result 1:

Favors in thinking comes from lacking of understanding how something works in life.

Example: Business Business owners use the limitations of human's education abilities as a tool for producing primary products for customers use for a profit range which changes as the economic cycle turns in stages.

Ex: TV mational and international People's lacking in knowing hoe electronics use electric energy for powering up a TV device.

So animation and vibraion from audio to reproduce a copy of a recording that will have fans amazed for centuries.


So this is one example that cause a business to be great from having people use there limits in understanding as a main source to buiness gains.


So everything is all about what people know and what people don't know. Key concept (patterns in life)

Cognitive Science

[edit]

This subject EXPLICITLY studies the mind and its precesses. However, it is composed of many subjects including AI, Psychology, Philosophy, Linguistics etc... Should some of these subjects be replaced since cognitive science "absorbs" them? After all, the field is dedicated to it.

Pronunciation & Respell (Thought and Think)

[edit]

Thought: /θɒt/ THOT
Think: /θɪŋk/ THINGK ~2026-10377-27 (talk) 00:33, 16 February 2026 (UTC)Reply

Neurobiological basis of Thought

[edit]

Can a section be added on this subject including speculative theories of how thought is produced in brain.  Preceding unsigned comment added by ~2026-41113-90 (talk) 11:37, 26 July 2026 (UTC)Reply

Hi and thanks for the input. A full section would probably violate WP:PROPORTION, but a paragraph or two could be added, possibly as a subsection of the section "In various disciplines". An explanation of how cognitive neuroscience studies thought, with references from reliable sources, would probably be better than a discussion speculative theories. Phlsph7 (talk) 17:22, 26 July 2026 (UTC)Reply