Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a2543c4a0e313014

Jump to content

Talk:Thomson Reuters

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 15 days ago by ~2026-40387-29 in topic Misplaced info

Headquarters location

[edit]

There has been some disagreement as to the location of Thomson Reuter's headquarters.

Although their 2021 factbook lists the headquarters in Toronto, their website lists the headquarters in Minnesota.

https://ir.thomsonreuters.com/financial-information/fact-book

https://legal.thomsonreuters.com/en/about/office-locations

Before further edits take place, I'd like to see some discussion as to which source(s) is/are appropriate, as well as what legal entity we are trying to describe. In the most recent edit summary, there was talk of a subsidiary, but the second page I linked above does use the term "Thomson Reuters headquarters" rather than "Legal division headquarters". I think this matter is quite unclear.

CameronNemo (talk) 20:32, 14 September 2023 (UTC)Reply

The headquarters location has moved to 19 Duncan Street in Toronto Ideafixxxer (talk) 01:56, 3 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

Referenced product may be incorrect in mass surveillance section

[edit]

This section mentions that the Thomson Reuters product involved in the ICE controversy is Westlaw. However, I think this may have come from an incorrect reading of the sources referenced. The New York Times article calls out CLEAR as the controversial data broker service, while Westlaw appears to be a database and search engine for case law. Snazz0 (talk) 04:26, 12 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

Yes, I think you are right. Vgbyp (talk) 10:47, 12 November 2023 (UTC)Reply
Have been working on this page, noticed this was never cleaned up. It is now fixed. 12EnergyPizzas (talk) 14:36, 4 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

Misplaced info

[edit]

The last item in the section for involvement in mass surveillance seems to be there erroneously as it has nothing to do with that. It instead describes a journalism error in the company's subsidiary need organization ~2026-40387-29 (talk) 12:15, 18 July 2026 (UTC)Reply