Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a23b327beb43ecfa

Jump to content

Talk:Thomas Cheek

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 1 year ago by 2600:4040:5AEF:B400:648C:55B8:64A3:FE67 in topic Alleged son in Virginia is utterly false

Alleged son in Virginia is utterly false

[edit]

This article has been edited by some biased person, probably in the United States, trying to gin up a fake pedigree to living descendents in Virginia. This is false. We know it is false because as per the biography at History of Parliament, when his wife died (the one he allegedly had a mystery son with "in Virginia" according to Wikipedia) here is what the official historians of Parliament say:

"Lady Katherine’s sudden death, though tragic, cleared the way for Cheke to remarry, for until now he had failed to produce the heir necessary to prevent his estates from escheating to the Crown after his death".

This means, definitively, he has no living children from his first marriage. Full stop. It is not only merely wrong to edit this article to baselessly claim this man had a son "in Virginia" (and with apparently biased living descendents as well) it strictly contradicts the factual sources. 2600:4040:5AEF:B400:648C:55B8:64A3:FE67 (talk) 23:46, 30 January 2025 (UTC)Reply