Talk:Think Like a Cat
Add topic| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Think Like a Cat article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the subject of the article. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | Think Like a Cat was one of the Media and drama good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake. | ||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
| Current status: Delisted good article | |||||||||||||
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
Use of the word "series"
[edit]I think all mentions of "series" should be replaced by something that will not mislead. The show has only one episode, how can it be a "series"? 202.92.144.250 (talk) 05:00, 26 March 2017 (UTC)
- @202.92.144.250:
Done. --Bcschneider53 (talk) 05:19, 26 March 2017 (UTC)
Orphaned references in Think Like a Cat
[edit]I check pages listed in Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of Think Like a Cat's orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.
Reference named "VarietyReview":
- From Inside Out (2015 film): Debruge, Peter (May 18, 2015). "Cannes Film Review: Inside Out". Variety. Archived from the original on July 26, 2021. Retrieved July 26, 2021.
- From Bee Movie: McCarthy, Todd (October 28, 2007). "Review: Bee Movie". Variety. Archived from the original on June 23, 2018. Retrieved October 1, 2014.
I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. AnomieBOT⚡ 22:34, 18 April 2022 (UTC)
GA Reassessment
[edit]The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
- Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • • Most recent review
- Result: Delisted. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 11:44, 24 August 2025 (UTC)
Of the nine sources in the article, one is About.com (which is listed as questionable on Wikipedia:DOTDASHMEREDITH), one is the show itself, two are press releases from the dubious looking "Cat Channel", and two are press releases. Given the show's short life and obscurity, this is probably about the best article you could write about it, but I still don't feel it's enough to pass GA. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 20:11, 23 July 2025 (UTC)
- Well seeing as how this is a single-program game show without information about contestants and winners, I'd say it's missing key information. Gonnym (talk) 20:22, 23 July 2025 (UTC)