Talk:Theo Stevenson
Add topicLatest comment: 14 years ago by Singularity42 in topic Incubator assessment
 | This article has graduated from the Article Incubator. |
 | This article was nominated for deletion on 24 July 2011 (UTC). The result of the discussion was Incubated. |
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Incubator assessment
[edit]Article incubation assessment
- Does the article establish notability of the subject ?
- A. It meets the general notability guideline: ?
- B. It meets any relevant subject specific guideline:
- Is it verifiable?
- A. It contains references to sources:
- B. There are inline citations of reliable sources where necessary:
- C. There is no original research:
- A. It contains references to sources:
- Is it neutral?
- A. It is a fair representation without bias:
- B. It is written in a non-promotional manner:
- A. It is a fair representation without bias:
- It does not contain unverifiable speculation:
- Pass, Fail or Hold for three months:
Comments
[edit]The main reason this was nominated for AfD appears to be lack of notability. It was incubated because it appeared that this person would become notable soon. That appears to have now happened. He has had significant roles in two major movies: Horrid Henry: The Movie and Reuniting the Rubins. Therefore, WP:NACTOR has been met. While there are no inline citations at the moment, I do not believe that should stand in the way of this article returning to mainspace. Singularity42 (talk) 21:17, 23 February 2012 (UTC)