Talk:The Who
Add topic| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the The Who article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the subject of the article. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
| Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4Auto-archiving period: 31 days |
| This article is written in British English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, defence, artefact, analyse) and some terms may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
| The Who is a former featured article candidate. Please view the links under Article milestones below to see why the nomination was archived. For older candidates, please check the archive. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| The Who has been listed as one of the Music good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
| This It is of interest to multiple WikiProjects. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Wrong I formation
[edit]Your information about the rock group the Who is not right.
My cousins formed the original rock group called "The Who" in 1960. 2600:6C64:6AF0:8B20:252E:C727:2892:966F (talk) 13:20, 5 May 2024 (UTC)
- yeah, and i thought of the iPhone before Steve Jobs--but here we are. ~2026-39058-59 (talk) 22:44, 9 July 2026 (UTC)
Katie Jacoby back in the touring band
[edit]As per Brian Kehew's blog (https://www.thewho.com/backstage-blog/thursday-28-august-2025-jones-beach-wantagh-ny/) Katie Jacoby has rejoined the touring musicians on violin -- I can't add her to the list of active touring musicians, but someone should! Opheliascarlet (talk) 16:17, 11 September 2025 (UTC)
The Who’s retiring?
[edit]They just did their last tour but I noticed the years duration is “1996-present” and I thought “aren’t they retiring?” since they just finished their final tour. Unless Daltrey and Townshend specifically said they only stopped touring but the band themselves will go on…..? RayKVega (talk) 18:12, 3 October 2025 (UTC)
- This has come up again recently. Does anyone have any sources describing the situation one way or another? Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 22:45, 1 August 2026 (UTC)
The Who capitalization: An exception to MOS:THEBAND?
[edit]This article inconsistently capitalizes the band name the Who mid-sentence. I count 89 of the Who and 8 of The Who.
Following Wikipedia standard style, MOS:THEBAND (and referenced in WP:THENAME and MOS:THECAPS), the definite article at the beginning of a band's name should be lower-case style when used mid-sentence. So, per the style, the band would be referred to as the Who. When the definite article begins the title of an album or other artwork, it should be capitalized. Again, per the style, referring to the specific album, correctly it is The Who By Numbers. And, per MOS:SIC, if a direct quotation uses capitalization that is different from Wikipedia style, the original capitalization should be used. So, if that's the way it's written in a quoted reliable source, it should be "This author says this about The Who."
Archived discussions have asserted that The Who is an exception. However that exception hasn't been carried over to the manual of style. As a result, this article has drifted to an inconsistent use.
I think this problem should be fixed, and done so in one of two ways:
- Implement an exception in MOS:THEBAND and then ensure that articles on the band consistently use that exception.
- Correct articles on the band to consistently use the MOS:THEBAND standard as written.
I argue against a potential third option of asserting an exception for this band but not implementing that exception in MOS:THEBAND, as we will only be perpetuating the inconsistency (and debates about it) for years to come.
I note that an exception to the policy was debated about the Beatles in 2012, and received a great deal of input. Ultimately, the decision was that the Beatles should be consistent with what is in MOS:THEBAND.
Personally, I think The Who and the Who are equally understandable, and so I would lean towards a consistent policy rather than creating an exception.
Thoughts? Davidwbaker (talk) 19:33, 17 September 2026 (UTC)
- The project-wide discussion in 2012 used the Beatles as a popular example, and the result of it was we established MOS:THEBAND for all bands. Before 2012, band pages were inconsistent.
- Regarding setting an exception for the Who, the only discussion here was in 2020 which you can see at Talk:The_Who/Archive_4#The Who versus the Who.. Hardly anyone participated, the arguments for an exception were weak, and no consensus was formed. This page should have been following MOS:THEBAND ever since 2012.
- Right after I hit "submit" on this post, I will comb through the page and return it to standard en.wiki style. It's not a big deal. Binksternet (talk) 22:09, 17 September 2026 (UTC)
- In November 2025, these article moves were performed based on the assumption that The Who was correct and not MOS:THEBAND:
- Oddly, the move discussion and subsequent move weren't mentioned here. Davidwbaker (talk) 03:31, 18 September 2026 (UTC)
- I moved them back. The requested move discussion on one of them was closed without giving MOS considerations the appropriate greater weight. No discussion occurred at the other one. Binksternet (talk) 22:18, 18 September 2026 (UTC)
- Thanks so much! I did some consistency cleanup. Davidwbaker (talk) 23:36, 18 September 2026 (UTC)
- I moved them back. The requested move discussion on one of them was closed without giving MOS considerations the appropriate greater weight. No discussion occurred at the other one. Binksternet (talk) 22:18, 18 September 2026 (UTC)
- Wikipedia articles that use British English
- Wikipedia good articles
- Music good articles
- Former good article nominees
- Old requests for peer review
- Biography articles of living people
- GA-Class level-5 vital articles
- Wikipedia level-5 vital articles in People
- GA-Class vital articles in People
- GA-Class Rock music articles
- Top-importance Rock music articles
- WikiProject Rock music articles
- GA-Class biography articles
- GA-Class biography (musicians) articles
- Top-importance biography (musicians) articles
- Musicians work group articles
- WikiProject Biography articles
- GA-Class England-related articles
- Mid-importance England-related articles
- WikiProject England pages
- GA-Class London-related articles
- Mid-importance London-related articles
- GA-Class Pop music articles
- Mid-importance Pop music articles
- Pop music articles
