Talk:The Way of Shadows
Add topic | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
 | A member of the Guild of Copy Editors, Stfg, reviewed a version of this article for copy editing on 19 January 2012. However, a major copy edit was inappropriate at that time because of the other tags now found on this article. Once these issues have been addressed, and any related tags have been cleared, please tag the article once again for {{Copy edit}}. The Guild welcomes all editors with a good grasp of English. Visit our project page if you are interested in joining! |
Comment
[edit]Hello there, I am the one who recently updated the ending of "The Way of the Shadows." I just want to say that there needs to be more information on the first and don't even get me started about the other two. All you have on them is what is on the back of the books. They are a great trilogy from an uprising author, and yet you have nothing on the subject. With what I added to the first book helped finish it off. thanks to you guys there are tons of sights out there that perpetrate the ending so abruptly at a random point in the story. It makes the story look like something I wouldn't want to read. Jeez. get on it or I'll do it all. take you choice.
- Might've helped if you'd signed your name.Gymnophoria (talk) 21:26, 7 October 2013 (UTC)
GOCEreviewed
[edit]This article is too unbalanced to be worth copy editing. It needs major updates bearing in mind Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not#Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information (item 1) and all of Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Writing about fiction. --Stfg (talk) 22:35, 19 January 2012 (UTC)
Overlong
[edit]Wow, someone's basically rewritten the whole novel on this page. Totally unnecessary and unwarranted for a page of such minimal interest!Gymnophoria (talk) 21:26, 7 October 2013 (UTC)