Talk:The Triumph of Doubt

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Books. To participate in the project, please visit its page, where you can join the project and discuss matters related to book articles. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the relevant guideline for the type of work.BooksWikipedia:WikiProject BooksTemplate:WikiProject BooksBook

Science

	Science portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Science, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Science on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ScienceWikipedia:WikiProject ScienceTemplate:WikiProject Sciencescience
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Should this article mention the response in Daily Mail?

Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

I created the following sentence to illustrate the wide attention that the book was getting:

The UK's Daily Mail published an article that extensively discussed the book's material on concussions in American football.^[1]

But the sentence was rejected by Wikipedia's screening software because it linked to the Daily Mail, a site deprecated as unreliable. Is this sentence, or some variant of it, worth inserting? If so, how? (any seasoned editor with a good idea is welcome to simply go ahead and implement it) --Presearch (talk) 00:30, 15 February 2020 (UTC)Reply

References

↑ Raskin, Alex (12 February 2020). "NFL 'delayed efforts to address CTE' claims ex-OSHA secretary". Daily Mail. Retrieved 15 February 2020.

[raskin20-1] Raskin, Alex (12 February 2020). "NFL 'delayed efforts to address CTE' claims ex-OSHA secretary". Daily Mail. Retrieved 15 February 2020.

[1]

This page was redesigned at the edge.

A page that knows where it met you.

Talk:The Triumph of Doubt

Should this article mention the response in Daily Mail?