Talk:The Solutions Project
Add topicLatest comment: 10 years ago by 24.116.185.76
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
This article needs a lot more criticism. Sentences Like:
"It is also worth noting that cost was not considered as a factor in rating any of the energy generation methods studied. A study without an economic component is of very limited value....
If I conducted a study for how I should get to work this morning in a similarly airy manner I might find that a helicopter ride or a chauffeur driven limo would appear as apt choices. Once I throw in economic considerations walking or taking the bus are the only viable candidates, and the earlier study does not help with that decision. Economic viability is a critical factor in evaluating energy generation schemes and if you leave it out of your study these is little value to any of the conclusions."
Being a nuclear power partisan (I'm not pro-nuclear I'm pro-numbers) I figured I wasn't the best person to write the the criticism section as it might get pointed. 24.116.185.76 (talk) 23:48, 28 October 2015 (UTC) A concerned citizen 24.116.185.76 (talk) 23:48, 28 October 2015 (UTC)