Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a23d2fc35f245645

Jump to content

Talk:The Snow Man

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 1 year ago by BearBikenCoffee in topic Original Research/Interpretation

Low importance?

[edit]

I'm surprised that this article has been rated "low importance" to the poetry project. Wallace Stevens is widely considered one of the most important English-language poets of the twentieth-century, and this in one of his best known and most discussed poems. Compared to Eliot's "Portrait of a Lady," which is another important modernist short poem and has a Wikipedia article that is rated "mid-importance," I bet "The Snow Man is in more anthologies and has drawn more discussion among literary critics. Hickoryhillster (talk) 02:33, 8 August 2009 (UTC) I agree completely and will try to upgrade treatment of Wallace Stevens, his poem and prose, and modernist poetry in English in general.  Preceding unsigned comment added by Wolffg (talkcontribs) 00:10, 11 October 2016 (UTC)Reply

Imbeciles discussing life.

[edit]

Sometimes I am shocked, sometimes only amused, at the way intellectuals can overthink something and contort ideas into the most egregiously convoluted nonsense. This article might well serve as a "poster child" for that idea. The Snow Man is a wonderful poem, full of fine nuance and imagery. What the author is talking about, I haven't a clue. I rather suspect that neither does he (or she).  Preceding unsigned comment added by MarvinLuse (talkcontribs) 04:42, 16 February 2017 (UTC)Reply

I agree with the above statement. There's lots to say about this poem, unfortunately, none of that made it here. Composerjude (talk) 01:10, 15 September 2019 (UTC)Reply

Original Research/Interpretation

[edit]

The "overview" section of this page reads like an interpretation of the poem. I have flagged that as original research. This should be entirely revised to describe how the poem has been interpreted, rather than give an interpretation. Composerjude (talk) 01:10, 15 September 2019 (UTC)Reply

Agreed, there is a lot of personal interpretation and not enough cited sources. I'm tagging this article to original research for now and will work to find some sources to draw from. BearBikenCoffee (talk) 09:55, 12 January 2025 (UTC)Reply