Talk:The Science of Interstellar

Science Low‑importance

	Science portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Science, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Science on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ScienceWikipedia:WikiProject ScienceTemplate:WikiProject Sciencescience
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Books

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Books. To participate in the project, please visit its page, where you can join the project and discuss matters related to book articles. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the relevant guideline for the type of work.BooksWikipedia:WikiProject BooksTemplate:WikiProject BooksBook

Criticism

Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Why is there no discussion or criticism of the so-called "Science" behind the film depiction of black holes and wormholes for the film Interstellar (film)? While the film is entertaining, you don't need a PhD to see how unrealistic much of the premise is. Let me just start with how survivable the trip thru a wormhole might be (there and back), and the overwhelming radiation environment around a black hole of any sort.--2600:6C48:7006:200:B056:6066:1296:EF0B (talk) 02:20, 15 January 2019 (UTC)Reply

This page was redesigned at the edge.

A page that knows where it met you.

Talk:The Science of Interstellar

Criticism