Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a220bd2c1b8acc78

Jump to content

Talk:The Random Years

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 3 years ago by RoySmith in topic Did you know nomination
Featured articleThe Random Years is a featured article; it (or a previous version of it) has been identified as one of the best articles produced by the Wikipedia community. Even so, if you can update or improve it, please do so.
Did You Know Article milestones
DateProcessResult
September 7, 2022Good article nomineeListed
September 8, 2022Peer reviewNot reviewed
October 4, 2022Peer reviewReviewed
October 23, 2022Featured article candidatePromoted
Did You Know A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on September 24, 2022.
The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that The Random Years includes a version of strip poker played to Antiques Roadshow?
Current status: Featured article

Did you know nomination

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by RoySmith (talk) 21:21, 13 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

Improved to Good Article status by Aoba47 (talk). Self-nominated at 08:42, 7 September 2022 (UTC).Reply

Article recently taken to GA by the nominator. All the hooks (including the additions by theleekycauldron) are cited properly and interesting enough. No sign of copyvio. QPQ done. This should be good to go IMO. FrB.TG (talk) 17:30, 9 September 2022 (UTC)Reply
Thank you for reviewing this. I would more than happy with any of the proposed hooks being used. I do not have a strong preference either way. Aoba47 (talk) 17:52, 9 September 2022 (UTC)Reply