Talk:The Qube

Untitled

This article has been automatically assessed as Stub-Class because it uses the [[Category:Michigan stub]] on the article page.

• If you agree with this assessment, please remove this message.
• If you disagree with the assessment, please change it by editing the class parameter of the {{WikiProject Michigan|class=stub|importance=}} above to the appropriate class and removing the stub template from the article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by SkiersBot (talk • contribs) 03:12, 29 October 2007 (UTC)

Requested move 7 May 2026

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: no consensus. (closed by non-admin page mover) Jeffrey34555 (talk) 03:38, 20 May 2026 (UTC)

---

The Qube → Chase Tower (Detroit)Chase Tower (Detroit) – Chase Tower is the current primary name listed on the owner's website, with The Qube used as a secondary name. 42-BRT (talk) 01:14, 7 May 2026 (UTC) — Relisting. ⹃Maltazarian ^{ᚾparley$\lor$investigateᛅ} 02:13, 14 May 2026 (UTC)

• Oppose. No valid rationale given. The owner's website is a primary source and does not justify a move. Possibly worth relisting to allow nom to look for evidence. Andrewa (talk) 01:43, 14 May 2026 (UTC)

  For what it's worth, the name "The Qube" was created by the current owner; the fact that that organization has ceased using it in a primary capacity is notable. 42-BRT (talk) 14:19, 14 May 2026 (UTC)

  As suggested by Andrewa, it would be nice to do some searching to see what name is primarily used by independent reliable sources. Being shorter than its width and dwarfed in height by other nearby buildings, it seems a bit strange to call it a tower. —⁠ ⁠BarrelProof (talk) 18:25, 14 May 2026 (UTC)

  Whether or not this usage is notable, and whether or not it is current, that usage is not relevant here. We are interested in what other people call the building, specifically of course in reliable secondary sources. Andrewa (talk) 06:13, 15 May 2026 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.