Talk:The Peony Pavilion
Add topic | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment
[edit]
This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page.
Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 11:08, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment
[edit] This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): QsCarolyn. Peer reviewers: Kyracsbloom, Aoifemahood.
Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 11:08, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
Most Recent Tour?
[edit]"Chen Shizheng's 20 hour version, with Qian Yi as Du Liniang, was perhaps the first full length staging in 300 years and spurred a renewed interest in the full opera beyond a few celebrated episodes."
Is this the tour that is going on right now? I know there's one that's touring the US (or the world?) but I don't really see any direct mention of it in this article. --Foe666 06:47, 1 October 2006 (UTC)
Fair use rationale for Image:The Peony Pavilion.jpg
[edit]
Image:The Peony Pavilion.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
Clarifications
[edit]I clarified that Tan Dun's version is different (and is really an adaptation) from Chen ShiZheng's version (which is a performance of the original work albeit with some liberties taken). Then I added some extra info about both. Phocion1648 (talk) 22:11, 5 June 2009 (UTC)
Interpretation and criticism
[edit]I have removed the entire "Interpretation and criticism" section of the article. The section had a number of major issues, and as explained in my edit summary, had been tagged as problematic for nearly 5 years at this point and yet had still not been updated with one single source. The complete lack of forthcoming sources after all this time leads me to believe the entire section was the personal opinion/original research of an editor, which is obviously not suitable for Wikipedia, without even mentioning the issues of tone. If the section is to be rehabilitated it will have to be rebuilt from the beginning with material sourced from actual noteworthy critics. River Peasant (talk) 20:50, 19 October 2025 (UTC)