Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a28f1e4e4d708020

Jump to content

Talk:The Mighty Lemon Drops

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 15 years ago by 69.165.138.51 in topic Neo-psychedelia

Untitled

[edit]

Couple of uses of "excellent" seem a bit NPOV..... ChrisTheDude 08:42, 20 January 2006 (UTC)Reply

Fair use rationale for Image:Mightylemondrops.jpg

[edit]

Image:Mightylemondrops.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 01:02, 14 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

Plagarism

[edit]

Looks like much of the biography originally came from . I gave the article a good clean-up before discovering this, which has reduced the amount of borrowed prose remaining in the article, but thought it needed to be mentioned - Foetusized (talk) 21:54, 8 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

Suggest minor correction of grammar as follows: 'In 2007 the band were reported to have been offered the chance to reform at the Coachella festival.[citation needed]' Furry Canary (talk) 13:15, 8 November 2009 (UTC)Reply

Neo-psychedelia

[edit]

Not up with the 500 music catagories that are being invented everyday. but since when was Neo-psychedelia was a category and used to describe band like these. Its just post punk and influence by 60's Garage and psychedelia as I see it. its being edited out.

"Their sound can best be described as neo-psychedelia in the vein of Echo & the Bunnymen, played with a ringing Rickenbacker guitar as the lead instrument.[1]"69.165.138.51 (talk) 04:02, 17 June 2011 (UTC)Reply