Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a24a60c39e1f6019

Jump to content

Talk:The Gypsy Morph

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 17 years ago by 124.190.210.188 in topic Nonsense?

Nonsense?

[edit]

Somebody edited this article to add some total nonsense - or best wishful thinking/fanfic at worst - messing around. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.115.83.236 (talk) 13:55, 2 September 2008 (UTC)Reply

Nice catch. I got tripped up editing the language without verifying the accuracy of the claims. Thanks for keeping me from looking like a total idiot. Now if there IS a reliable source for those claims ... ;) --Quartermaster (talk) 16:17, 2 September 2008 (UTC)Reply

Could someone PLEASE spellcheck that page? Is this Wikipedia for 10 year olds? Terrible grammar all around. - HPDDJ —Preceding unsigned comment added by HPDDJ (talkcontribs) 05:30, 11 September 2008 (UTC)Reply

Agreed. I made a quick stab, at least correcting "Logon Tom" to the correct "Logan Tom." Consider that since anyone can edit Wikipedia, that maybe a 10 year old DID make the plot summary? In which case "kudos!" to them, but the need for even more cleanup is still obvious. Lots of run-ons and comma splices. I also changed "centre" to "center" not because I'm biased against British spelling, but because a)Brooks writes primarily in American English, and b) the action takes place in what was the continental United States. I can live with either spelling with no problems. --Quartermaster (talk) 13:19, 11 September 2008 (UTC)Reply

Can haz informative page without plot synopsis regurgitation? A condensed, more general summary would be far better, in my humble opinion. I could also say the same for alot of the Shannara series book articles. Iriscal 03:48, 20 September 2008 (UTC)Reply

The "new characters" section is pretty useless. It lists mostly characters who dont actaully play a part in the story, being figments of this one guy's imagination- in addition, the 'unnamed girl' and the pair of demons are impressive only for how minor their roles are, appearing on roughly 3 pages of the novel each. The only important character on the list is Wills or whatever he's called, and the synopsis outlines pretty much everything the reader learns about him —Preceding unsigned comment added by 124.190.210.188 (talk) 09:28, 24 September 2008 (UTC)Reply