Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a223ed329bda14c2

Jump to content

Talk:The Beguiling

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Latest comment: 8 months ago by Bgsu98 in topic GA Reassessment
Former good articleThe Beguiling was one of the Social sciences and society good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
October 8, 2013Good article nomineeListed
November 22, 2025Good article reassessmentDelisted
Current status: Delisted good article

Move to Mirvish Village

[edit]

This article is misleading re when the store moved to Mirvish Village. It was already located in the two-storey there as early as the fall of 1996 (I know, because I began shopping there regularly my first year of university there), before it was sold to its subsequent owners. I couldn't tell you what date the move was.

I'd be happy to edit it so that the timeline was clear, but without a citation, I'm not going to just make stuff up. As written, it doesn't actually say that it moved after being sold---it's ambiguous, as are the sources I can find. A reference with the move date would be most helpful. CüRlyTüRkeyTalkContribs 02:28, 16 May 2012 (UTC)Reply

GA Review

[edit]
This review is transcluded from Talk:The Beguiling/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Khazar2 (talk · contribs) 12:02, 6 October 2013 (UTC)Reply

I'll be glad to take this one, Curly--sorry you've had to wait so long for a review on it. Comments to follow in a minute. -- Khazar2 (talk) 12:02, 6 October 2013 (UTC)Reply

Okay, this looks solid and essentially ready to pass. I've made some tweaks as I went; feel free to revert any with which you disagree and we can discuss. Only two points I see that need attention:

Thanks for your work on this one! -- Khazar2 (talk) 12:18, 6 October 2013 (UTC)Reply

That'll do it, then. All other criteria checked and satisfactory; thanks for another quality contribution. -- Khazar2 (talk) 02:05, 8 October 2013 (UTC)Reply

Article review

[edit]

It has been a while since this article has been reviewed, so I took a look and noticed that there wasn't any post-2017 information in the article. When I searched for sources, I found , , , which gives information on what the store did during COVID-19. I suspect that more searches in databases like WP:LIBRARY or those connected to the Toronto Public Library system would yield additional results. I think the prose and the lead need to be updated and expanded upon. Should this article go to WP:GAR? Z1720 (talk) 20:54, 31 August 2025 (UTC)Reply

GA Reassessment

[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · WatchWatch article reassessment pageMost recent review
Result: No efforts have been made to address the nominator's concerns. Bgsu98 (Talk) 04:41, 22 November 2025 (UTC)Reply

It has been a while since this article has been reviewed, so I took a look and noticed that there wasn't any post-2017 information in the article. When I searched for sources, I found , , , which gives information on what the store did during COVID-19. I suspect that more searches in databases like WP:LIBRARY or those connected to the Toronto Public Library system would yield additional results. I think the prose and the lead need to be updated and expanded upon. Z1720 (talk) 00:47, 3 November 2025 (UTC)Reply

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.