Edge Rewrite
// HTMLRewriter · presentation

This page was redesigned at the edge.

Cloudflare fetched the original article and streamed it through HTMLRewriter to apply an entirely new visual system without rebuilding the source page.

// request.cf · coarse context

A page that knows where it met you.

Only coarse request metadata is shown. This demo does not display or persist visitor IP addresses.

Country
US
Cloudflare location
CMH
Connection
HTTP/2
Language
Not provided

Ray ID: a45c8f75cb9a365e

Jump to content

Talk:The Accidental Asian

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

[edit]

This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Rmei8.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 10:57, 17 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

Index of reviews

[edit]

Index, with publication names and issue dates. —Arsonal (talk + contribs)— 06:03, 30 July 2010 (UTC)Reply

Extra stuff

[edit]

I'd been doing some research to create this but was beaten to creating the article :). I've deleted the subpage where I was working on it, but here is how far I got (some of the links may be used already, but others could be useful):


The book itself

Definitely use
Booksellers
Maybe

Evaluation of this article

[edit]

I like how you mention Accidental Asian is a collection of seven essays and short memoirs. However, I'm confused when you explained some of the chapters of the book because just saying chapters is not helpful enough. Personally would like it better to be able to tell if the chapters were essays or memoirs. I would like to see a summary of all seven essays and short memoirs if it is allowed and update the media type as well. The Media type just says hardcover, but the times have changed and there Kindle and paperback version of the book. I feel like the review is good, but it could be more organized because it looks like the reviewers are right after each sentence and it would be nice if there was space. I notice as well that it said "One of his arguments.." at the top of the page and wondering if should really be there? It could be better if you don't start with one of the arguments, but a different ways to introduce Liu's arguments. One more thing is how there was no mention of the reviewer from Chong-Hao Fu and seem there no point of adding the refer to the site. Hopefully this information or my personal view was helpful. Rmei8 (talk) 17:40, 17 March 2017 (UTC)Reply